TYB
& RIP Christopher Sign
kek
>Now, excuse me while I smoke another fag.
well that's harsh
however, anon has this anon's full throated endorcement
>why didn't they allow people to read it for 1200 years.
Because monks of the Catholic persuasion had to make alterations first.
18 Alterations Made to the Bible and its Consequences
Acts 8:37 from the King James Version of the Bible confuses readers on requirements of Baptism
The Amplified Bible tries to improve readability by Inserting editorial comments and ideas throughout the text.
Bible word counts differ substantially… Yet Revelations threatens God’s consequences if the text is altered.
Amplified Bible Alterations also warn and threaten consequences to taking away from the text of the Bible.
Changes to the Gospel of Mark give Christians instructions… But these instructions come from an unknown author.
Changes to Matthew and the Lord’s Prayer first appear in Byzantine texts – which is much later than commonly believed.
The Controversial History of the King James Bible sometimes creates doubt on whether it is a reliable source for the Word of God.
Early criticism of the King James Bible shows inaccuracies in translation from earlier texts.
Mistranslations in the King James Bible go on and on.
10. The New Testament’s translation in the King James Version sometimes isn’t even based on ancient text – they don’t know where it came from
Translation of words and the printing accident that caused a 17th century printer to print the mistake: “Thou Shalt Commit Adultery”
The Septuagint and Hebrew mistranslations could hold major revelations about the Virgin Mary.
Problems from the beginning – the very beginning. The creation story translated directly from Hebrew Texts gives Genesis a whole new meaning.
The first verse of the King James Version of the bible reads, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth”. The original Hebrew does not contain the definite article the, and pluralizes heaven to heavens. It also includes when correctly translated into English the word had and thus the verse should read, “In a beginning God had created the heavens and the earth”. This translation contains several implications when applied to the verses which follow, since it clearly states that the earth and indeed the universe had been created at an earlier time. Whether the translators of the KJV deliberately altered the meaning or translated it thus out of a lack of knowledge of Hebrew is a matter of speculation.
(monks fixed the original SUMERIAN text of THEIR creation myth)
“Giants” in the earth could be an enormous mistranslation that rewrites many of the Bible’s stories
Isaiah Chapter 9, verses 6 and 7 written in the King James Version reflects the Monarchy’s message to the people: Being King is a divine right.
More Calvinistic influence
17. Jesus on the pinnacle verses reflect the views of the translators rather than the original writers.
All scripture is inspired by God, including each and every verse in the Bible is NOT what God’s messengers intended.
more:
https://historycollection.com/18-alteration-made-to-the-bible-and-its-consequences/
Anon does know. It was precisely a long shit ton
as opposed to a short shit ton. Either way, they're all shit.
(anon did dunk for the biscuit, never got the slap)
nope, escaped Catholic
>Is SOROS funding the faggots who are fighting the parents?
Baby commie was with Harris today, so yeah, more likely than not
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/vp-kamala-harris-huddles-with-george-soros-scion-ahead-of-2024/ar-AA1ccItr