>>18965997

>What if technology will be released that would make oil obsolete overnight?

>What if there are countries helping with the plan that would be greatly affected by this technology release?

>Would those countries be given financial opportunities to shift prior to the technology transition?

'Section 101 of the DPA authorizes the President to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders and to allocate materials, services, and facilities to promote the national defense or to maximize domestic energy supplies.'

https://www.fema.gov/disaster/defense-production-act/dpa-authorities

'Trump repeatedly called ventilators "generators" in his Sunday briefing and made a quip about the irony of the "generators" being stored in a warehouse in Edison N.J. Does he know that ventilators are not a form of electrical equipment?'

https://www.quora.com/Trump-repeatedly-called-ventilators-generators-in-his-Sunday-briefing-and-made-a-quip-about-the-irony-of-the-generators-being-stored-in-a-warehouse-in-Edison-N-J-Does-he-know-that-ventilators-are-not-a-form-of

Trump hasn't ordered any ventilators from GM, despite saying he was using wartime powers to force production

'WASHINGTON – Nearly a week after invoking his powers under a Korean War-era law to compel General Motors to manufacture ventilators for coronavirus, President Donald Trump’s administration has not formally ordered any of the machines, USA TODAY has learned.'

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/04/02/coronavirus-trump-said-force-gm-build-ventilators-he-hasnt/5100856002/

>>18966055

>Affordable solar/storage?

'Trump repeatedly called ventilators "generators" in his Sunday briefing and made a quip about the irony of the "generators" being stored in a warehouse in Edison N.J.'

Now what would be ironic about storing a revolutionary generator technology in Edison, Anon? Who was Edison's rival?

>>18966089

>So the other 6 justices voted to hear the case? Am I understanding this correctly? I thought all it took was a majority.

Writs of Certiorari

Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear these cases, and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value. In fact, the Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year. Typically, the Court hears cases that have been decided in either an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state (if the state court decided a Constitutional issue).

The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case. Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/supreme-1

>>18966118

>Wonder which justices voted for and wonder who didn't vote at all. Possible?

'The “rule of four” is the Supreme Court’s practice of granting a petition for review only if there are at least four votes to do so. The rule is an unwritten internal one; it is not dictated by any law or the Constitution. Under the rule, the court can grant review and hear oral argument even if a five-justice majority of the court prefers not to do so. (At the same time, even if four justices are inclined to hear a case, those justices might not vote to grant review if they believe the full court is likely to issue a decision on the merits with which they disagree.) The rule also applies to other actions by the court – for example, the decision to delay action on a petition for review until another case involving the same issue is resolved.'

https://www.scotusblog.com/election-law-explainers/rule-of-four/

All anon can find is that the justice's conferences are private, there's no indication that a record is kept on how the justice's vote on petitions reviewed in conference.

'Conference Days: The Justices meet in a private conference to discuss cases argued earlier that week. The Justices also discuss and vote on petitions for review.'

https://www.supremecourt.gov/legendkeyinfo.aspx#ConferenceDays

>>18966173

>>"go home"

>what did he mean by this?

§254. Proclamation to disperse

Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.

>>18966181

>3) Then last night, President Trump tells the Michigan rally that we are "going to have alternative forms of energy"

'Section 101 of the DPA authorizes the President to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders and to allocate materials, services, and facilities to promote the national defense or to maximize domestic energy supplies.'

https://www.fema.gov/disaster/defense-production-act/dpa-authorities

'Trump repeatedly called ventilators "generators" in his Sunday briefing and made a quip about the irony of the "generators" being stored in a warehouse in Edison N.J.'

https://www.quora.com/Trump-repeatedly-called-ventilators-generators-in-his-Sunday-briefing-and-made-a-quip-about-the-irony-of-the-generators-being-stored-in-a-warehouse-in-Edison-N-J-Does-he-know-that-ventilators-are-not-a-form-of

Trump hasn't ordered any ventilators from GM, despite saying he was using wartime powers to force production

'WASHINGTON – Nearly a week after invoking his powers under a Korean War-era law to compel General Motors to manufacture ventilators for coronavirus, President Donald Trump’s administration has not formally ordered any of the machines, USA TODAY has learned.'

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/04/02/coronavirus-trump-said-force-gm-build-ventilators-he-hasnt/5100856002/