Q+ calls out the REAL fascists
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110504130524282517
Haaretz editors are all projecting fascists.
>antisemitic dog whistles
This 'dog whistle' logic is nothing but a lie to cover up Haaretz' own fascistic, unfounded smearing and slandering of Tucker.
All these corrupt orgs use the same narrative too, 'tropes', 'dog whistles', all vague hand waving bullshit to cover up the fact they have nothing but false accusations.
By Haaretz' own logic, if criticizing Soros is proof of bigoted hateful evil anti-semitism, then Haaretz' criticism of Tuckeris itselfbigoted hateful evil anti-Christianity.
>the political agenda of white liberals
What's interesting is that almost all 'white liberals' are not even the original source of said political agenda; they're puppets, conduits…tricked, intimidated and coerced into echoing the agenda, to avoid being smeared, slandered and attacked themselves.
The shills hate Mr. Pig for at least two reasons:
-
The shills hate 'America winning'; and
-
The shills megalomaniacal narcissistic personality disorders are triggered into attack mode by 'personas' not their own. They want the attention they criticize. It reminds them too much of their own futility and powerlessness.
It is inconsistent, hypocritical if you will, to submits posts attacking Anons for neglecting to post 'sauce', if such attacking posts themselves lack sauce to support the reason the criticism is valid.
Sometimes information is very easily 'confirmed' by the existence of many sauces all open source, in which case copying and pasting 'sauce' here isn't critical, as it has 'sauce' out there at the time of posting, e.g. Instagram caught with pro pedophilia algo.
Other times one bit of new information is so consistent with the bulk of all open source information that no sauce now just means no sauce yet but it will almost certainly become readily available, e.g. cause for rise of 'died suddenly'.
And other times sauce is warranted because neither of the above is the case.
>low budget twitter show
Got that kids? When you get 100 times more views than 'high budget' enemy of the people CNN whose ratings are in the toilet, it's a valid criticism for CNN to slander you as 'low budget'.
What CNN is effectively saying is that they are incompetent with money and doing a terrible job dollar for dollar.
Anon has yet to see that happen, but whatevs.
>You've yet to see them accuse someone of narcissism?
Anon is here almost every day, and the answer is never seen it.
Is it like the flak rrn sends to admittedly deliberately make 'maga' look bad?
>When you say 'Anon' are you referring to yourself in the 3rd person
of course, don't want to speak 'for' any other Anon.
3.5
Kek, cringe meme