Biggs: At the direction of Secretary Mayorkas, DHS has released and continues to release tens of thousands of aliens every month through mass-parole, and now categorical parole. Is this a violation of law?

Bradbury: Yes, it violates INA Section 212, D5A.

Biggs: Secretary Mayorkas is also mass-paroling aliens he himself characterizes as refugees or asylum seekers, without demonstrating compelling reasons requiring that that particular alien may be admitted by parole rather than going through USRAP process for refugee admissions. Is that a violation of law?

Bradbury: Yes. It's a violation of INA Section 212, D5B.

Biggs: [Mayorkas] is not conducting adequate individualized vetting of the huge volume of mass-released aliens, there is no way of knowing how many of the millions of aliens Mayorkas has released in the US falls under the category of dangerous aliens. Is that a violation of law?

Bradbury: Yes. Of Section 212A.

Biggs: Secretary Mayorkas has instituted the CBP-1 pre-registration [app], trying to funnel these illegal migrants to the US Ports of Entry along our southern border. Is that a violation of law?

Bradbury: Yes. Of 212, of 235, and I would say of 207.

Biggs: Do you believe Secretary Mayorkas is violanting the law intentionally, willfully, or is it just some oversight on his part?

Wolf: I think it's all of the above. I think they know exactly what they're doing, 'they' being the department [DHS]. This construct they have put in place is not by happenstance or chance, it is by design.

Hunt: The border crisis is their [Biden administration] only success. I say that because they have successfully created a chaotic situation to carry out a radical agenda…I suspect they will present a 'solution', and that solution in the future will be an attempt at mass-amnesty.

Ross: [Biden] inherited a disaster of a border from former President Trump. We all watched it on TV, aghast.

Chairman McClintock: Asylum hearings are designed to be adversarial in nature, they are presided over by immigration judges bound by the law. How does that differ from the administration's replacement of this process with USCIS asylum officers?

Bradbury: It's completely different because they are reviewing their own appeals of their own decisions…it's in violation of Section 103 of the INA. It's the attorney general and the immigration judges that have to hear those appeals.