Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 12:57 p.m. No.18973191   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3200

>>18973168

over a hundred years ago a law suit said that all Free Mason symbology must be removed from all public buildings.

why is a pride flag, an emblem of a movement and almost a cult, exempted from the same kind of scrutiny?

it should not be.

a pride flag is almost an emblem of the Democrat party, too.

you can't fly a Vatican flag on a public building, why should you be able to fly a pride flag?

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:11 p.m. No.18973234   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3315 >>3326 >>3336

looking at teh board log I notice that a BV is on a rampage of editing posts.

posts that are so old that they aren't even going to be linked from the catalog.

what is the purpose of this? what are those posts?

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:35 p.m. No.18973327   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3341 >>3355

>>18973247

if posts are being deleted now at the whime of some angry BV, why do they still allow these kind?

If we're going to start deleting horid hateful posts (not me, I say 'we') why do they allow these psychologically damaged bullies to keep posting?

just an observation.

what's good for the goose is good for the race-baiter.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:40 p.m. No.18973346   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18973336

sounds like a job for sed and gawk!

 

Once I had to edit hundreds of pages because on a whim someone had change the codes for an emoji.

that's why I don't use them anymore, it's at some random person's whim what will show up.

 

TY for the info.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:45 p.m. No.18973367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3380 >>3397

>>18973355

no, my comment about angry BV isn't about that.

Most of the BV do good work.

but I've noticed that sometimes posts get deleted and it's spurious.

Usually if it's about the . . . .

 

and yet someone can post the N-word repeatedly and taunt and harrass but that poster is given cart blanc to be a jerk to some other anon.

I don't like censorship, and I think that a jerk who is a jerk has a right to be a jerk, and I wouldn't delete it but filter it.

however, given that some types of posts (abot the > > > ) get deleted instantly, why is it that the racebaiter who posts the N word over and over is not?

again, I'd not delete any of it but leave it as a record to man's inhumanity to man.

 

(shills inhumanity to man)

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:47 p.m. No.18973378   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18973337

sad how this news is years and years old, and yet many people are probably hearing it for the first time.

and many will sadly never hear it, even though they might want to.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:51 p.m. No.18973388   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3403

>>18973380

if I say who it is, won't I get deleted then? that's been my experience in the past.

who do you think I mean?

the generic 'untoucables', those who we can not post about unless we are one of them.

could be any group, that's untouchable.

as if you don't know exactly what I mean.

 

I make it generic so it's not seen as being against any one group.

any group that assumes that they are the special group that no one is allowed to criticise.

in Eastern Europe it was the Marxists, back in the day.

 

In England it's probably the Royals.

 

what group could it be, anon?

 

what do I mean?

 

I mean this: I don't like censorship.

no group should be the 'special group' that no one can criticize.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:56 p.m. No.18973409   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3439

>>18973397

the record of them being a jerk is lost, anon.

if you delete what you don't like then no one ever sees it.

and they think 'all is well'

in fact we have to deal with this constant hazing by these crews who haunt the board.

 

nothing of value?

if you don't let the racist have his voice, then how will you know that it's a racist?

you will thus be unable to mitigate it, or have any information on their tactics to later come up with a way to perhaps educate and convert them.

 

that will be lost.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 1:59 p.m. No.18973415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3431

>>18973403

and there it is, the haters who never get deleted.

so now those who oppose censorship are said to be using the 'soft approach'?

anything to justify your petty tyranny, anon?

 

it used to be that there would just be a lot more breads.

you and your crew are just lazy, that's all.

Anonymous ID: 41329d June 8, 2023, 2:41 p.m. No.18973599   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18973590

anti censorship, anon.

did you not read my posts.

it doesn't matter, you are tasked with acting as if no matter what I say that I'm wrong.

 

have a nice day.