>>18974279 pb
FIRST ARREST is Marker [9]?
>>18974233 pb
>>18974342 pb
that's why I wrote this coming Tues.
someone was quibbling with me over "Q SAID"
kekek. like it's a Guru.
and it turns out "Q" did mention "first arrest" picrel
>>18974315 pb
As I read it, in retrospect, that was a technique to engage anons.
If we were told it would be five years we'd likely never start.
Also, it's a communication that Q drops are different from literal statements.
"disinfo is necessary"
and we have to do our own work
Also, not all messages are meant for us.
and
We only see how the crumbs fit, in retrospective.
?
>>18974254 pb
^ I guess this guy is wrong ^
insulting and wrong at the same time; interesting combination.
maybe just trying to slide.