>>18976028

TYB!

This Neely thing.

The argument from the killer is, "The guy I killed might have killed someone."

Anon's ignoring the "George Floyd" aspect of it. (Hello.)

The logic of the killer is suspect.

Anon's not planning on running out and rioting like a chicken with head cut off screaming the sky is falling.

Anon sees holes in the logic of the "savior" in the story, and wonders, why killing is preferable to "threats"?

The guy didn't even hit anyone, before he was killed? Not the same as Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman, then. (Hello, second George.)

Anon's seeing this from an odd perspective.

Do we kill people to keep them from harm?

Rhymes with, "You might infect me, so stick this up your nose/on your face/in your arm."

>>18976441

ugh

thumbnails

anyone got the larger version so we can read it?

>>18976395

> >>18976387

>getting really hard to think of new ways to say in minecraft. when the very thing that needs to be said is what cant be said. But should be said because people are thinking it.

break it apart

in mine craft

they're talking about spell-casting?

>>18976473

kek you made it worse, hat tip topkek pots

>>18976472

> >>18976458

>is screaming threats to the public a form of free speech? If not, what protections are provided to the public to stop said speech?

Good question anon.

Really good question.

"I killed him because he might have harmed someone."

That's not a really strong case.

Especially if he was just ranting and had not struck any person.

Nothing's perfect here, only when we get home.

But I see holes in the defender's (killer's) logic.

What were the nature of the threats?

Was it "I'm going to kill someone" or did he look directly at a specific individual and say, "I'm going to kill you?"

Someone died.

He "might have harmed someone else" but did he?

Was this like the "Perverted Golden Rule" -"Do unto others, first"?

>>18976480

> >>18976475

>filturd for complaining instead of thanking anon for the effort

>i went out of my way and you give me shitty advice

TOPKEK!

Okay, right now youanon bread-shitter is learning:

EFFORT IS NOT EQUAL TO ACHIEVEMENT

Thank you for memories of working days.

Good luck in future.

>>hat tip topkek pots

>hard pass

Perhaps anon compressed anon's ending too much previously, oh well, you filtered and aren't listening anyway. Anon's on the pots, enjoying your words with laughter, and tipping my hat at your absurd attempt to "enhance" like the TV shows.

topkek, and I meant it! :)