>>18992514

the new BO rules such attacks on other anon are no longer acceptible.

report all suggestions of suicide like it's CP

>>18992525

>>18992522

some twit says 'become ungovernable'

if every attack on an anon is reported, then we follow that twits rule

>>18992526

reported as an attack on anon.

new rules from BO say such behavior is to be reported.

>>18992568

I know that the person who posts the time machine threats is a fav of the crew that gangstalks everyone here.

and they are the same bunch that posts the nonsense 'become ungovernable'

so using the new BO rules, and the jingo that is posted that if you counter it that results in the gang stalking, and the threats, technically now anon are with free license to report every death threat, all uses of the N word to intimidate, etc.

and thus become ungovernable.

they have to review each report.

>>18992559

gosh, gee, are you really that inept?

>>18992578

anon, a lot of those here do NOT support censorship and think that the 'new rules' are rediculous.

but we are also under constant attack for benign reviews of the crap that gets posted by various crews of agency shills.

and so if they 'report' you for making threats it's not that they care, because they are hardened anon, but as a way to use the rules that are arbitrarily installed by the crew here, and used on those who are not on the crew, as a way to make it a lot more difficult for them to play the games that they play: deleting benign posts, only being upset about one kind of slur, only deleting posts about one group, and not any others, and basically turning this place into 4ch

>>18992622

I think that poking the bear is often something to do as a demonstration.

we see who gets offended, who is emboldened, and what is allowed.

I prove over and over again what is said over and over again: about who are enabled, and what they seem to be.

but the facts are the facts: once these skunks are in charge they

1. never feel remorse

2. always continue with the discord

3. never surrender

4. attack anyone who isn't in their crew.

we see pretty quickly who is and who is not in the crew.

we can report harrasment and gather evidence and see how quickly the miscreents are 'forgiven' for their constant attack.

we can log which BV dismisses the report,

and we can tell the BO (but clearly doesn't care) about it.

He'll say 'send me an email'

sure . . .

so any reports of attacks that are directed at anyone who isn't part of the perferred group, and the protected class are met with 'oh, you're a cry baby' or 'you think you're so important'

meanwhile even the slightest discussion of the preferred group, if you aren't on their crew, is met with deletion or gang stalking.

so anon can see this.

and enough of us 'poke the bear' from time to time to show the hypocracy.

but ultimately it's futile because

they will never surrender this beachhead since they took it over.

and there is no one who will take it away from them.

so we are stuck with an anti-Q team running the Q board.

and for me it's just beating a dead horse to demonstrate that this is an occupied locale for too long.

but it is.

we see pretty quickly what is allowed by reports dismissed by the bad actors who are BV.

at least we can document it.

so dart thinks that attacking other anon is fine, using the N word is fine.

being a jerk to other anon is fine to dart.

and we can tell the BO this, but BO isn't going to do anything about it.

>>18992814

you prove the hypocracy of the crew that festers in this board and acts as BV for the Cabal.

over and over you prove that these breads are occupied and that the anon are treated as enemies.