Anonymous ID: fa0c9b June 25, 2018, 9:58 a.m. No.1899357   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1899227 (lb)

>>1899299 (lb)

There are a couple of restaurants named 1331

 

A few examples:

https://foursquare.com/v/1331-restaurant--lounge/4bf1ee8da09076b0d7f329d4

http://www.1331-york.co.uk/

http://www.le1331.fr/>>1899227

Anonymous ID: fa0c9b June 25, 2018, 10:13 a.m. No.1899505   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9539

>>1899445

I just use it to filter out spammers, kek.

It's up to every individual to decide what to do. The option is there to use or not use.

Do you consider Anons not capable of making such a choice themselves?

By removing the function you remove their right to choose freely.

Anonymous ID: fa0c9b June 25, 2018, 10:25 a.m. No.1899654   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9666 >>9672

>>1899539

>Anons are not newfags. This is for newfags.

I can see your point there. I do not believe, however, that newfags should be treated as another class of anons. Unity, not division.

 

>This is false. They can choose not to read it with their fucking brains.

This is true. I do not, however, see the reason for the removal of an entire set of optional tools simply to force everyone to slough through tons of spam (see where this differs? A choice vs an enforcement).

I find removing available tools wrong on the principle that it is not an enforced tool but entirely optional. If detractors try to have unwary people filter things their interest group does not like, well the anons can (as you said) "choose not to read it with their fucking brains", right?

 

Thank you for your input

WWG1WGA