>>19006331 lb
check the time on the posts. quick Q, innit?
if you imagine you get a lot of anons posting, "hi Q" "dig" "NEW Q!!" and whatever. 26 secs is not only symbolic but also rather fast. almost as if known before.
>timeline.
>>19006331 lb
check the time on the posts. quick Q, innit?
if you imagine you get a lot of anons posting, "hi Q" "dig" "NEW Q!!" and whatever. 26 secs is not only symbolic but also rather fast. almost as if known before.
>timeline.
26 secs.
imagine a small or larger group of guys in a room with a lot of devices. imagine making a typo. can you see a reply by anon with the typo, go check, and reply back in 26 secs when Q drops always had a shit ton of replies fast (in this case Q posts dragged anons to the board already obviously),
>GS
<3
yes, the roast, me.
doc.
frens.
frankly kind of noone did anything, I do it all.
get loose. not like that. why would I have made anything bad?