>>19007846

TYB!

> >>19007361 (pb) Hands on Healing CIA declas

anon is topkekking,17 patents confirm, picrel

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00787R000500090007-3.pdf

Anon sees two perspectives in those three words, "17 patents confirm":

1. A quantity of patents between 16 and 18 exist, which show their leadership.

2. Q was writing patents in infancy (Q appears to be gen X, from observation of movie/TV/culture quotes - which anon agrees could be misdirection).

Of course that latter is somewhat humor/wordplay; "the Q team" has been around longer than the ~51-year-old individual ("that's an odd number"; yeah, chosen because 51 = 17 x 3). :)

>>19008271

> >>19007980

>Don't care - he is still a hero.

"Hero" for killing someone who had not touched a person?

Some weird definition of hero.

Kill anon for arguing with wifeanon?

Not very heroic.

Heroic would have been understanding why the guy was upset, and helping him.

Killing is never "heroic" although Satan wrote a lot of books to convince us of that.

God bless in Jesus name.

>>19008371

> >>19008287

>You seem to conveniently forget the other people on that subway car that were being threatened

gaslight much?

you don't know what anon is remembering, regardless of how much anon writes.

"threatening" requires killing in response?

gaslight more.

>>19008385

> >>19008380

>cry harder

topkek gaslighter, emotional appeal is the last refuge of the incompetent

gaslight, n. to tell someone that what they are experiencing is not what they are experiencing.

>>19008397

> >>19008380

>killing is the wrong word to be using. it could be possible manslaughter because it was not intentional that the person in question died he was placed in the recovery position and he was alive when ambulances got there he died later. The question is what are people supposed to do when others are actively threatening violence. It is not like he set out to murder the guy. Accidental death perhaps but not the way you are trying to paint it either.

I choose my words specifically and exactly. He killed.

"Murder" might be the wrong word to use?

Manslaughter is when you use your vehicle incorrectly and it results in a death.

This wasn't manslaughter. (Well, it was "slaughter of a man"; words play all the time due to ambiguity.)

This was not accidental misuse of a vehicle.

He chose to put the man in a choke-hold.

Choking means loss of oxygen/breath-of-life.

What's the LD50 on choke holds?

>>19008411

>What's the LD50 on choke holds?

https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2021/09/14/2021.09.13_chokehold_carotid_restraint_knock_and_announce_policy_final_0.pdf

>>19008415

>>>19008411 (You)

>>What's the LD50 on choke holds?

>https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2021/09/14/2021.09.13_chokehold_carotid_restraint_knock_and_announce_policy_final_0.pdf

DOJ says choke holds are inherently dangerous

>>19008422

>Manslaughter

intentional deprivation of air is what?

>>19008270

kenrak

kraken

kek

>>19008494

> >>19008428

>>DOJ says choke holds are inherently dangerous

>What idiot other than a libtarded shill would trust anything DOJ said?

>I get it though, start arguments to waste bread and bury good stuff, it's all your side has left

Will let you check the date of that report. kek

>>19008404

kek

that was you judging facts and other people's knowledge and vanity

gaslight again