>>1900733
lawfag jr. without reading all of the filings , my guess is a prosecution would name it as weapon of mass destruction and not the specifics you list. The specifics would be irrelevant. This says the case had no standing so double jeopardy does not apply. Also the statement suggesting someone who had standing would be barred from filing a complaint is erroneous. The case was not decided on the merits.
Normally I would glance at something like this and scroll on past it. You should do the same and ignore the shill