Gareth Wyn Williams (26 September 1978 – c. 16 August 2010) was a Welsh mathematician and Junior Analyst for GCHQ seconded to the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS or MI6) who was found dead in suspicious circumstances at a Security Service safe house flat in Pimlico, London, on 23 August 2010.[1] The inquest found that his death was "unnatural and likely to have been criminally mediated."[2] A subsequent Metropolitan Police re-investigation[2] concluded that Williams's death was "probably an accident"

Police visited Williams's home during the afternoon of Monday 23 August 2010, as a "welfare check" after colleagues noted he had been out of contact for several days.[11] His naked, decomposing remains were found in the bath of the main bedroom's en-suite bathroom, inside a red bag that was padlocked from the outside, with the keys inside the bag.[12][13

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Gareth_Williams

MI6 'body-in-bag': Gareth Williams forensic evidence to be re-examined

'After his death, there was widespread speculation in the media that it could, in some way, be linked to the secret intelligence work that he was engaged in as a GCHQ officer.'

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-57448396

https://qalerts.net/?q=gchq

>>19010239

>prolly king arthur or some shit!

>this timeline!

https://qalerts.net/?q=fvey

29 post(s) found containing "fvey".

Re_ read drops re: Five Eyes / FVEY.

Will be extremely important going forward.

"SURV of SC/JS terminated." - Q

Relevant to upcoming 'DECLAS' events?

SIGINT FVEY/Domestic.

FISA = IMPLICATES SENIOR MEMBERS OF UK MI5/6/SIS, US INTEL, WH, FVEY, R PARTY (CONGRESS/SENATE) OF KNOWN CORRUPTION IN EFFORT TO RETAIN POWER AND RIG ELECTION

SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY?

https://qalerts.net/?q=fvey

>>19010368

>Look around, all the evil are in power.

>No way a good God will allow this.

1 John 5:19

>>19010628

Anon. Not Bot.

>>19010681

>"P2"

>There's your P, folk.

Scandal Erupts Over Italian Masonic Lodge

By Sari Gilbert May 26, 1981

A mushrooming scandal involving a secret Masonic lodge had forced the justice minister to resign and threatened the reputations of a large group of politicians and other influential Italians.

The scandal, which concerns the role of a secret Freemasons lodge known as the P2 or Propaganda Due, has been brewing ever since the mid-70s, when Italy's leftist press launched accusations that it was a "hidden center of power." It came to a head in recent weeks along with developments in a longstanding judicial investigation into the activities of the lodge's fugitive grandmaster, Licio Gelli, for whom an international warrant was issued Friday.

Gelli and another lodge member who formerly was a secret services official, Col. Antonio Viezzer, have been charged by magistrates in Milan and Rome with political espionage and attempts to obtain information damaging to state security.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/05/26/scandal-erupts-over-italian-masonic-lodge/4145524c-dd67-4a52-8428-caeabd027524/

>>19010697

>The standard is Navy v. Egan, a 1988 case, unanimous decision from the courts, from the court, that — Justice Blackmun wrote the opinion.

>And it said the president’s ability to classify and control access to national security information flows from the Constitution.

Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988)

The President, after all, is the "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States." U.S.Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security and to determine whether an individual is sufficiently trustworthy to occupy a position in the Executive Branch that will give that person access to such information flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant. …The authority to protect such information falls on the President as head of the Executive Branch and as Commander in Chief.

…

"As to these areas of Art. II duties, the courts have traditionally shown the utmost deference to Presidential responsibilities." United States v. Nixon, 418 U. S. 683, 418 U. S. 710 (1974). Thus, unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise, courts traditionally have been reluctant to intrude upon the authority of the Executive in military and national security affairs.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/