Anonymous ID: 926856 June 17, 2023, 11:53 a.m. No.19022779   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2844

>>19022761

This isn't an airplane, so that's not even an argument

We're talking about digital warfare. DATA ON A SCREEN.

It could all be collected with a simple program vs scrolling for hours each day

I think that alleycat guy tried it with a bread launcher thing

but that shit's too archaic looking

and probably malware

If you hadn't baked this bread yourself I'd think you were a bot

Anonymous ID: 926856 June 17, 2023, 12:45 p.m. No.19022970   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2993

>>19022933

>it couldn't note unless anons called out notables, but if anons called out notables we wouldn't need it

LITERALLY all I do when I collect notes is search for the links.

A simple program could do this for me.

It would be like hands free fapping.

Anonymous ID: 926856 June 17, 2023, 12:55 p.m. No.19023032   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3046 >>3066

>>19022993

It would be pruning bloatables vs scrolling through a pile of spam and schizobabble.

It would pick up 100-150 posts, from my experience

strip all the spam and create buns and fit to character limit by the end of the bread.

HELL, some retard could probably create a macro with crtl + f to do this

I'm just not that retard, I'm a naker baker pot taker

Anonymous ID: 926856 June 17, 2023, 1:04 p.m. No.19023076   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3083

>>19023066

>but you'd miss noteworthy posts that didn't contain links

We as a cohesive anonymous unit have been able to call most of those out thus far, I think.

I also KNOW there is big tech out there that could probably pick all that shit up anyways.

If shill have it, why the fuck don't we?