>>1901779 (from last bread)

>Hard to say if it's of any value, but it's an interesting programming challenge.

>The numbers are the occurrence count.

>>1901857

>I'm not a numbers guy, but I always enjoy looking at things like that. Thank you. Maybe someone can see something there.

>>1901927

>I was considering doing something similar with twats from POTUS. Wonder if it would correlate to a message. Nice work anon

Some anon did a freq distribution of items from Q posts. Interesting clustering of words {but subject to my own bias, of course}

>>1902889

>On November 4

Eric said that in 2016!

'Specifics, Bob, specifics…'

>>1903048

>Do you know what year Q was talking about? Why is this relevant? LOL!

LOL! TRUE, but I think Q actually addressed this indirectly recently in relation to HUBER (see image)

But, who knows…Q also cryptically confirmed [J C] as = John P Carlin, but I am not convinced. I think he "confirmed that" to thru some off the trail since the initial suggestion was made over "egg shells" and that hint may have not been intended for "anons."