Anonymous ID: 6bc84f June 25, 2018, 3:08 p.m. No.1902593   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1902566

Hmm… there are a lot of interesting people who, if they were really alive, would be quite the problem for the cabal.

 

Or, thinking mirror… what if an unknown twin or dopple-ganger was killed, instead?

Anonymous ID: 6bc84f June 25, 2018, 3:20 p.m. No.1902699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2737 >>2774 >>2812 >>3152

>>1902508

Red October was Snowden. Probably an old handle he used, just like mine would be … well… you probably know, spookanon.

 

I thought Q's posts made it relatively clear that Red October was Snowden. Snow ready for melting would imply that Snowden is ready to act. Snowden revealed to the Kremlin a number of vulnerabilities the NSA exploited and would have found their way into Kaspersky's suite. As the U.S. federal government is very much an enemy at this point in time, use of Kaspersky would potentially mitigate NSA's exploitation.

 

Snowden… open the door/close the door. By giving Kaspersky the tools to remove certain exploits and then banning it among U.S. government systems, it preserves the NSA's own internal methods while removing the ability of bad actors to spy on foreign actors.

Anonymous ID: 6bc84f June 25, 2018, 3:35 p.m. No.1902832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2875

>>1902737

I know you're not Q, Anon. However, I think you (or people you work with) probably know quite a bit about me. I've been on that radar since at least 2013. That facebook group I was added into for no reason wasn't for no reason, either, I imagine. Kind of a holding cell to keep my need for argument sated until such a time as it was necessary to get back into the fray I was scouted from.

 

Anyway -

 

By using Snowden the way he did, Hussein could then basically blame the NSA for being the bad guy. The infrastructure for PRISM, however, isn't necessarily limited to the NSA. The same concept could be applied by a third party - such as In-Q-Tel or another corporate actor owned by bad actors. This could then be used along with targeted advertising routines (as the cover for implementation) to control how people interact with the web.

 

The internet changed over the past 10 years. It went from an activity-driven source reactive to the population, to a personalized injection. The web user is constantly bombarded with a stream of information controlled by algorithms that take their personality into account. People are constantly reacting to a stimulus being imposed on them rather than seeking out a stimulus to interact with.