>>19035128. pb

honestly, POTUS (and anyone who has an opportunity to address this on television)…

whenever the interviewer or anyone says there was "no evidence" the election was stolen, please, please, please smack them with facts. how, HOW can there be "no evidence" the election was stolen? do they know what "evidence" means?

geez… i can produce evidence of time travel for fucks' sake. it's been proven that time is relative - there ya go. circumstantial evidence, to be sure, but "evidence".

there wasn't just some evidence the election was stolen, there was and is overwhelming evidence.

just say that. make them rebut it.