>>19040033

Possibilities I can think of:

1. The data was the result of fudgery/malfunction and has been removed

1. The data is so interesting that the scientists responsible have to verify it before publishing it again

1. The data is so 5D majic that it has to be classified

>>19040053

Something to keep in mind is that we are approaching summer solstice.

>>19040060

I mean can crop circles not be the result of bored farmers doing prankery?

>>19040099

I am torn between wanting to "believe" and knowing about how bored humans can get, and how easy video editing is.