>>19040755 LB
>https://www.c-span.org/video/?528836-1/house-intelligence-committee-members-reaction-closed-hearing-john-durham&live
Couple of fast talkers there.
As an American, he had a recognized right to have one. Even when it is him -I don't think anyone has a right to ask why he needs one
…unless it is at trial for crimes relating to his ilegal uses of a firearm.
I see black cock shill is back from a long break
…I hope she doesn't post her vacation photos.
Correct.
Sure. You can say any stupid shit you want to like "Why does Hunter need a gun?"
Could just be a matter of semantics though -you appeared to be questioning his right to possess an item. A fair approach would be "What was Hunter's intent in possessing a firearm? …was he in danger, or possibly plotting criminal activity?"
Sounds like a personal question, unless you're attempting to question his right to travel freely under his own conveyance.
Sounds like some have a lot to learn about freedom
…are you sure you're ready for this?
Shouldn't you be busy with your evening "It's the Vatican!" dumps?
Testifying publicly in front of the Judiciary Committee …could be amusing as fuck, especially if they are going to talk about federal law violations.
Intelligence Comittee: "Oh we didn't hear anything to expose some "Deep State."
…maybe that's because the intelligence community is part of that, dumb fuck.