>>Icebergs do not travel that far south.
>EXACTLYwhat I thought when I saw that map
Agree, so Ocams Razor?
>Icebergs go wherever they please
umm "intelligent icebergs", Ok then :-) Not thought of that.
I'm on the "it was scuttled" thought process.
Can't say I have ever seen the location published b4. Maybe it has?
TV just said a 2500km2 area being searched ?
Whats down there (they) don't want seen?
Who died in sub? connections? whistle blowers?
>Canadian aircraft detects undersea sounds
Where are PlaneFags?
Is this possible, from Air to way down deep, "tap tap tap" ?
per SBS doco on TV…
it EXPLODED (not imploded) into million bits. Showed footage (BS? not sure)
but Science: Solid>Liquid>Gas Vapour (under extreem pressure) so NO COOLING !
Nuke subs go long, but CAN NOT go deep.
Basically underwater "steam engines"
>Sub hunters
OK, thx. but sub sub sub , engine engine engine, or prop prop prop ie constant 'noise'
would lost sub have a "tap tap tap" 'speaker' on board to transmit? Carbon fibre so not like a metal hull.
Man this whole thing sounds 'sketchy' to anon atm
>why they do not have ships or planes that are using sonar
gud Q. how deep can sonar detect?