Anonymous ID: 413aca June 21, 2023, 8:09 p.m. No.19049500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9587

According to high iq Ted……the left is indeed the enemy

 

His take on leftism was quite penetrating (Kaczynski's IQ was 167).

 

Here's an excerpt via The Washington Post's archives:

Some leftists may seem to oppose technology, but they will oppose it only so long as they are outsiders and the technological system is controlled by non-leftists. If leftism ever becomes dominant in society, so that the technological system becomes a tool in the hands of leftists, they will enthusiastically use it and promote its growth. In doing this they will be repeating a pattern that leftism has shown again and again in the past. When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists were a minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous proponents of academic freedom, but today, in those of our universities where leftists have become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to take away from everyone else’s academic freedom. (This is "political correctness.") The same will happen with leftists and technology: They will use it to oppress everyone else if they ever get it under their own control.

 

Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists' drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement (see paragraph 83). But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity (see paragraph 41). That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. [35] Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It's not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause.

 

Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, some new social "evil" to correct because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society's ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society.

When he's right, he's right.

 

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63810

Anonymous ID: 413aca June 21, 2023, 8:24 p.m. No.19049587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9608

>>19049500

“Again,” Tom repeated, “as a way of avoiding war. Or really, since I don’t think war is all that likely, just as a way of avoiding further strife and acrimony. The tensions, the temperature, the dislike, even the hatred—they’re all so high. Why do we live together? Take your statement a second ago. Isn’t it contradictory? You call me and my kind ‘yahoos’ and you threaten to use the military to destroy us. That clearly illustrates hate. Yet the threat also shows a determination to force us to stay together no matter what. Why would you want to force people whom you hate, and who want to leave peacefully, to stay with you?”

 

“Well, to be honest,” Malcolm said, “I don’t really care about you people at all. But if you threaten my country, you force me to care.”

 

“‘My country,’ Tom repeated. “Listen to you. A moment ago, you were mocking my patriotism. Now you sound a like a Rush Limbaugh listener circa 1995. What happened to the Malcolm who used to have bumper stickers that said ‘Question Authority’ and ‘Dissent Is the Highest Form of Patriotism’?”

 

https://asylummagazine.ca/MALCOLM-OR-ON-SEPARATION

Anonymous ID: 413aca June 21, 2023, 8:25 p.m. No.19049608   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19049587

That’s what I wanted to talk to you about,” Tom said. “We’d been drifting apart for a long time, despite growing up on the same street and going to the same schools. Until, that is, you went off to Brown and I went to Grove City. But now it seems we have nothing in common.”

 

“How,” Malcolm asked, “could a cultured, accomplished person like myself have anything in common with a troglodyte like you?”

 

“How indeed,” Tom said. “That’s my point. Why do we live together anymore?”

 

“We don’t,” Malcolm said. “I live in Pacific Heights and you live in Fremont.”

 

“Actually,” Tom said, “I moved to Texas three years ago.”

 

“Well, then. What’s the problem?” Malcolm asked.

 

“The problem,” Tom said, “is that, not only don’t we have anything in common, we increasingly disagree about everything, in ways that can’t be reconciled. Wouldn’t it make more sense for us to live apart?”