>>19050503
>Ain't doing it in a hearing
They did it in a hearing yesterday morning -9am eastern. They just haven't told us "who" yet.
>Throw in the Saudis (before they were neutered)
I don't believe the House of Saud was neutered. Does your dog throw a kick ass party for the vet after he cuts off his balls? The House of Saud was liberated -and that's how you get a sword dance, as all their own rogue (royal) officials get rounded up for some luxury jailing. Throw in something here about a journalist who needed murdering, probably because of his arms dealing familial connections.
The world doesn't work the way we have been taught to believe.
England and probably all of Europe's crowns have been the prey of Roths for centuries, I think that is fairly well discoverable with some effort. The Dutch Royal Family of "Dutch Royal Shell" oil are still a bit of a mystery to me, and I'm sure that's by design -but they haven't seem to have had much trouble holsing onto their power …all others seem to have "infiltration problems" that likely go back centuries.
If the Vatican were in charge of anything but hiding someone's secrets -why would they need to kill a Pope they had just elected (circa 1977 or so)?
Why step carefully with our "allies"?
You don't destroy the world to save it. Just because the world doesn't work like we have been taught it does -doesn't mean it shouldn't.
Deal with the world's cancer in unity -everyone go home and build your country as it was supposed to be in the brochure. Help each other -be friends.