>>19059444

>Dana is just in it for the money. I mean come on, it will be the EASIEST money he ever makes. Zuck & fuck are doing it because they are attention whores & want to distract the people of the world from how everything is failing terribly. I won't watch. It's all so fucking gross and obvious. I hope they kill each other though

Dana said it would be donated, but I agree with your sentiment. Donations only matter if the NGOs actually do mission…and many/most don't. Fuck 501c3s/c4s. I gave some money to Judicial Watch and the NRA and over the last couple years, they've sent me more in mailings, postage, and free gifts all worth more than what I donated.

>>19059592

>Musk had headups on the sub

sauce?

starlink helping military?

We need a Satoshi Nakamoto for A.I.

>>19059621

>Yeah, if I ever won the lottery, I'd give most to charity, but ONLY to ones that prove over 90% of the money goes to the actual cause. Right now I'm poor AF, so I only give $11 a month to Tunnel 2 Towers. They seem legit. But it's so sad when you see CEO's on Charities makes millions & millions a year & only a tiny tiny portion of donated money actually goes to what it all should go to.

https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pallotta_the_way_we_think_about_charity_is_dead_wrong

interesting counterpoint that I remember from years ago.

>>19059621

>Right now I'm poor AF

Save your money. Get rich. MAGA. You'll be more impactful investing in yourself, your family, and your community. I forget the source, but I've even heard some dirt on T2T. Not conclusive but…no one is immune. It's really just a bad model to outsource charity is the point. We need to do it ourselves.

>>19059727

They lose value at a slow enough rate to make a decision on how to invest. Focus on the second part.

>>19059655

fair enough. just providing the perspective. not saying I agree with it.