Morning anons…
Wagner PMC a big dealio…eyes on…
If anyone has a health issue fire away…
>What did they do for Anthrax back on 911? Flight 93..
Not sure anon…Webb is Mossad…I am sure you know that…
anthrax it is…looks like its mechanism of action is three separate toxins. One of the has an interesting shape.
What do you want to know about anthrax? It is a BUG. It is pathogenic. It is lethal in high enough doses. It can be aerosolized.
>Na it's more like you are a disinformation troll from Jason goodmans basement.
I am here every morning anon…I am doing what God has asked me to do. If you view it as "disinformation" that is on you fren…
>Look here: PMC actors play acting coup.
No…this is an actual coup attempt. The Wagner head is a friend of Putin but also a very wealth businessman. I would guess he was BOUGHT and PAID FOR by the west to stage this coup.
We are seeing the final moves. The cabal had to try to take out Putin and this was a BOLD attempt which has now failed.
The cabal does not have much left. Ammo expended.
Wagner to slide dis?
REPORT ON COVID ORIGINS
Utter bullshit BTW…interesting that they do not all agree…
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf
(U) In March, the IC updated its analysis on core intelligence questions related to COVID-19 origins, to include whether the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2—the virus that causes COVID-19—was the result of natural exposure to an infected animal or a laboratory- associated incident. Variations in IC analytic views on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic largely stem from differences in how agencies weigh intelligence reporting and scientific publications and intelligence and scientific gaps. All agencies continue to assess that both a natural and laboratory-associated origin remain plausible hypotheses to explain the first human infection.
•
• • •
TheNational Intelligence Council and four other IC agenciesassess that the initial human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was
caused bynatural exposureto an infected animal that carried SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor, a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS- CoV-2.
TheDepartment of Energy and the Federal Bureau of Investigationassess that a ==laboratory-associated incident was the most likely cause of
the first human infection== with SARS-CoV-2, although for different reasons.
TheCentral Intelligence Agency and another agencyremainunable to determine the precise origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, as both hypotheses rely on significant assumptions or face challenges with conflicting reporting.
Almost all IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not genetically engineered. Most agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not laboratory-adapted; some are unable to make a determination. All IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon.