>>1906586
>I wonder if what the importance of Q proofs could be that by Mueller looking at prince's phone
>>1906742
>Definitely gets the evidence to be presented "legally"….doesn't it??
If you had undeniable evidence of child sex slavery and snuff films, why would you need such an elaborate method of "presenting the evidence legally"?
American citizens can be indefinitely detained and assassinated with no need for any evidence.
We invaded Afghanistan and Iraq with no evidence.
But we have undeniable proof of the most heinous crimes ever committed and we have to play hide-and-seek games?
And the media is/can be totally controlled by intelligence agencies/the pentagon for whatever purposes they want, but we they still attack us daily?
GLOVES OFF, Q