>>1907833

>>1907784

> trying to become a useful baker

seems you are well on your way there anon

>>1907833

>It is an issue we're going to have to address, before shit gets real.

I concur wholeheartedly anon.

The issue is what can be done other than foster new bakers and try to instil some sense of editorial discretion.

I ranted a bit this moring

>>1897890 (pb)

> no one is "front and center"

>I participate, and if I didn't, I wouldn't have (you)'s from Q

I see cognitive dissonance in that 1ec8a0 (32) post

>>1908001

>so that when the teams of bakers come together, no one fuck with them. More bakers will surface, like whales, big hearts ;-)

shout that out to BO

I mean that

I've been trying to get BO to allow bakers to have ID that carries between breads. so all can identify which baker is which without having to resort to easily copied graphics or imitation of style (which is a bit more difficult but only slightly)

>>1908026

I hope so