Anonymous ID: c189e9 June 26, 2023, 12:02 a.m. No.19075160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5176

>>19075046

tyb

latest news about russia and wagner, posted around 6 hours ago.

A very important bit of advice, never work with criminals and weak minded individuals, this is

from own personal experience, there is no moral criminal code or high minded acts. In that world everyone is indispensable and collateral damage is high and expected.

o7

-----

SOME CLARITY FROM GENREAL MACGREGER ABOUT THE PUTIN, WAGNER AND C.I.A, MEDIA CLOWN SHOW - NO ONE REALLY KNOWS WHAT IS HAPPENING !!!

Note: During war time, no one trust anyone, especially mercenaries who are hired for money and promises. With everything it is always to wait a few days before the truth emerges.!!!

GEORGE GALLOWAY & COL. DOUGLAS MACGREGOR: RUSSIA-PUTIN-WAGNER-PRIGOZHIN-UKRAINE

https://rumble.com/embed/v2ts5uk/?pub=4

Anonymous ID: c189e9 June 26, 2023, 12:24 a.m. No.19075176   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5182

>>19075160

THIS WEEKS BIG EVENT WILL BE THE STRESS TEST OF THE BIG BANKS

Below is what the summariser states.

below that is the link to the B.I.S article,

-------

https://search.brave.com/search?q=project+ice+breaker&source=desktop

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the central banks of Israel, Norway, and Sweden have launched Project Icebreaker, a joint exploration of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) can be used for international retail and remittance payments.0 The experiment explored a "hub-and-spoke solution" as a way around the challenge of high remittance fees during cross-border payments.3 The participating central banks settled for a specific way to interlink domestic systems, facilitated by a foreign exchange provider active in both domestic systems.2 Project Icebreaker is the first to explore connecting retail CBDCs in a hub and spoke model as a cross-border CBDC application.1 This competitive set-up mitigates the risk of insufficient liquidity in the desired currency pair, which can drive fees up and even delay the transaction. The Icebreaker system implements the use of bridge currencies if transactions between two specific end currencies are unavailable or not favourable, promoting competition among foreign exchange providers.3

-----–

Project Icebreaker concludes experiment for a new architecture for cross-border retail CBDCs

https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cbdc/icebreaker.htm

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the central banks of Israel, Norway and Sweden have concluded Project Icebreaker, which studied the potential benefits and challenges of using retail central bank digital currencies (CBDC) in international payments.

 

A collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Nordic Centre, Bank of Israel, Norges Bank, and Sveriges Riksbank, the project tested the technical feasibility of conducting cross-border and cross-currency transactions between different experimental retail CBDC systems.

As detailed in the report, Project Icebreaker sets out to explore a specific way to interlink domestic systems (a so-called hub-and-spoke solution). A cross-border transaction is broken down into two domestic payments, facilitated by a foreign exchange provider active in both domestic systems. Therefore, retail CBDCs never need to leave their own systems.

 

In most existing cross-border payment systems, the payer has no choice regarding the exchange rate, as it has no control on who the provider of foreign exchange conversion is. In the model developed by the Icebreaker project, many foreign exchange providers can submit quotes to the system's hub, which automatically selects the cheaper one for the end user.

 

This competitive set-up mitigates the risk of insufficient liquidity in the desired currency pair, which can drive fees up and even delay the transaction. The Icebreaker system implements the use of bridge currencies if transactions between two specific end currencies are unavailable, or not favourable, promoting competition among foreign exchange providers.

 

The project also demonstrated that the hub-and-spoke model can reduce settlement and counterparty risk by using coordinated payments in central bank money; and complete cross-border transactions within seconds. For countries considering the development of a domestic CBDC, the project provides a model for extending them and innovative services into cross-border transactions.

 

For central banks contemplating the implementation of retail CBDCs, the outcome of Project Icebreaker provides deeper understanding of the technologies that can be used and the technical and policy choices available. The project presupposes very minimum technical requirements so as to be able to integrate domestic systems running on different technologies (as was the case with the proofs-of-concept used by the three central banks), thus promoting scalability, interoperability and simplicity.

Anonymous ID: c189e9 June 26, 2023, 12:33 a.m. No.19075182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5193

>>19075176

correction - project ice breaker is not connected to the Banks Stress Test this week!!

note: Do not ignore but again, this is not part of the stress test scheduled this week.

-------—-

Project Icebreaker (00:04:46)

6 Mar 2023

Project Icebreaker shows how it is possible to use domestic retail CBDCs for cross-border payments.

Anonymous ID: c189e9 June 26, 2023, 12:49 a.m. No.19075193   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5197

>>19075182

THE STRESS TEST HAS ALREADY HAPPENED, THE RESULTS WILL BE RELEASED WED

Factbox: What's new with the U.S. Fed's 2023 bank stress tests?

By Pete Schroeder

June 26, 20235:49 AM GMT+1Updated 3 hours ago

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/whats-new-with-us-feds-2023-bank-stress-tests-2023-06-26/

WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve is due to release the results of its annual bank health checks on Wednesday, June 28. Under the "stress test" exercise, the Fed tests banks' balance sheets against a hypothetical severe economic downturn, the elements of which change annually.

The results dictate how much capital banks need to be healthy and how much they can return to shareholders via share buybacks and dividends.

WHY DOES THE FED "STRESS TEST" BANKS?

The Fed established the tests following the 2007-2009 financial crisis as a tool to ensure banks could withstand a similar shock in future. The tests formally began in 2011, and large lenders initially struggled to earn passing grades.

Citigroup (C.N), Bank of America (BAC.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Goldman Sachs Group (GS.N), for example, had to adjust their capital plans to address the Fed's concerns. Deutsche Bank's U.S. subsidiary failed in 2015, 2016 and 2018.

However, years of practice have made banks more adept at the tests and the Fed also has made the tests more transparent. It ended much of the drama of the tests by scrapping the "pass-fail" model and introducing a more nuanced, bank-specific capital regime.

SO HOW ARE BANKS ASSESSED NOW?

The test assesses whether banks would stay above the required 4.5% minimum capital ratio during the hypothetical downturn. Banks that perform strongly typically stay well above that. The nation's largest global banks also must hold an additional "G-SIB surcharge" of at least 1%.

How well a bank performs on the test also dictates the size of its "stress capital buffer," an additional layer of capital introduced in 2020 which sits on top of the 4.5% minimum.

That extra cushion is determined by each bank's hypothetical losses. The larger the losses, the larger the buffer.

CONTINUED

Anonymous ID: c189e9 June 26, 2023, 12:50 a.m. No.19075197   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19075193

THE ROLLOUT

The Fed will release the results after markets close. It typically publishes aggregate industry losses, and individual bank losses including details on how specific portfolios - like credit cards or mortgages - fared.

The Fed doesn't allow banks to announce their plans for dividends and buybacks until typically a few days after the results. It announces the size of each bank's stress capital buffer in the subsequent months.

The country's largest lenders, particularly JPMorgan Citigroup, Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N), Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley (MS.N) are closely watched by the markets.

A TOUGHER TEST?

The Fed changes the scenarios each year. They take months to devise, which means they risk becoming outdated. In 2020, for example, the real economic crash caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was by many measures more severe than the Fed's scenario that year.

The 2023 tests were devised before this year's banking crisis in which Silicon Valley Bank and two other lenders failed. They found themselves on the wrong end of Fed interest rate hikes, suffering large unrealized losses on their U.S. Treasury bond holdings which spooked uninsured depositors.

The Fed has come under criticism for not having tested bank balance sheets against a rising interest rate environment, instead assuming rates would fall amid a severe recession.

Still, the 2023 test is expected to be more difficult than in previous years because the actual economic baseline is healthier. That means spikes in unemployment and drops in the size of the economy under the test are felt more acutely.

For example, the 2022 stress test envisioned a 5.8 percentage point jump in unemployment under a "severely adverse" scenario. In 2023, that increase is 6.5 percentage points, thanks to rising employment over the past year.

As a result, analysts expect banks will be told to set aside slightly more capital than in 2022 to account for expected growth in modeled losses.

STRESSES IN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, CORPORATE DEBT

The exam also envisages a 40% slump in the prices of commercial real estate, an area of greater concern this year as lingering pandemic-era office vacancies stress borrowers.

In addition, banks with large trading operations will be tested against a "global market shock," and some will also be tested against the failure of their largest counterparty.

For the first time, the Fed will also conduct an extra "exploratory market shock" against the eight largest and most complex firms, which will be another severe downturn but with slightly different characteristics.

This extra test will not count towards banks' capital requirements, but will allow the Fed to explore applying multiple adverse scenarios in future. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr has said multiple scenarios could make the tests better at detecting banks' weaknesses.

WHICH FIRMS ARE TESTED?

In 2023, 23 banks will be tested. That's down from 34 banks in 2022, as the Fed decided in 2019 to allow banks with between $100 billion and $250 billion in assets to be tested every other year.

END