>>19075854 (pb)
anon, don't miss this post.
true or not true it sure does seem more plausible than the 6.3 billion, which seems like a tiny amount in terms of 'world-graft' that flows out of the DC swamp.
in this narrative the anon claims that the Russians took the three-letter swamp-agency for 50 billion (or more, I suppose).
maybe this will finally convince the democrats to shit-can the Bight mes and clean house in DC?