WHEN ARE WE GOING TO CONVICT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FOR GIVING "AID OR COMFORT" TO AN ENEMY, FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC?
AND FOR FAILING TO UPHOLD THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
US Constitution, Article IV, Section 4….
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN form of government, and shall PROTECT each of them AGAINST INVASION; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiv
5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331
To responsibly restrain the powers of Congress, America’s founding fathers built multiple provisions into the US Constitution that ensure we will never face the type of tyrannical rule that caused them to revolt against the British in the first place.
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS CAN NOT MAKE LAWS THAT CONTRADICT THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Along with the US Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers, the Bill of Rights is one of the primary documents America was founded upon. The Bill of Rights informs every law related to US citizens, so to contradict it with any new law would be to compromise the entire American judicial system. To use an analogy, if the judicial system were a house, passing a law that ignores or contradicts the Bill of Rights would be like knocking out a support beam from the structure after it was built—it would collapse the entire building….BUT HAVE TO BE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY COURTS