Anonymous ID: aba12d June 25, 2018, 11:39 p.m. No.1908054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8058

>>1908011 (lb)

>I've been trying to get BO to allow bakers to have ID that carries between breads.

 

Oh? And who chooses the bakers so they can receive their shiney new baker id?

 

Bakers unions were tried already and failed.

Anonymous ID: aba12d June 25, 2018, 11:45 p.m. No.1908102   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8133

>>1908066

>no

 

Thank you. The reason why what you want isn't possible is because ID'ing the bakers without "an authority" (like the pre-storm bakerrs union) would require ID'ing ''all'' of us.

 

Because anonymity is enforced here, there is no way to have what you want, AND anonymity, at the same time.

 

And baker's unions do not work.

Anonymous ID: aba12d June 25, 2018, 11:54 p.m. No.1908160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8286 >>8647

>>1908133

>Bakers can request whitelisted trips from the BO, no? And shill bakers can be weeded out based on performance.

 

This places an extraordinary burden on the BO. I would understand why they could be against this.

 

The reason for that is because there have already been several attempts to split the board via attacks on the BO and BV's.

 

Tasking them with whitelisting rando bakers would just open up another attack vector for attempted board splits.

Anonymous ID: aba12d June 26, 2018, 12:23 a.m. No.1908326   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8358

>>1908286

>BO & BV see a hash that is constructed from the IP that the poster used.

 

Do you even know how IP hashes even work? Please.

 

>The only fly in the ointment I see is if it becomes a requirement that the baker have positive ID to bake.

 

Not possible on a board where anonymity is enforced. The last time it was tried [ie- the fabled baker's union], the board went to complete shit. You cannot play identity ''anything'' if identity politics are out.

 

>Showing they can bake in the test kitchen shuold be a reqwiremant b4 baekin don U thing?

>Demonstrating the editorial discretion and critical thinking to collect decent notables might be another requirement.

 

None of this will attract new blood.

 

>But the big problem anon is if we the mere peons of this board cannot tell one baker from another with accuracy how can we accurately chastise the bad ones?

>How can we instruct the sincere ones?

 

Develop your discernment. No one else can do it for you. That counts for all of us. Hand holding time is over.

Anonymous ID: aba12d June 26, 2018, 1:26 a.m. No.1908489   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1908358

> … put forth by the left, you cannot discriminate! discrimination is bad!

 

Pot. Kettle. Black.

 

Discrimination and id politics are not the same thing. And you should know better than to try to project anything onto anyone if you are running comms.

 

"discrimination" = a form of prejudice in modern language.

 

"identity politics" = Cult of personality.

 

Good day.