WEF: Public Must Consume ‘Human Waste’ to Fight ‘Climate Change’

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is urging governments around the globe to begin recycling “human waste” for public consumption to fight “climate change.”

The plan involves diverting human feces and urine captured from sewage back into the food supply.

The effort is being promoted to tackle “global warming” by reducing the alleged “carbon emissions” from food production.

The WEF, which is pressuring mainstream media outlets to begin pushing the narrative, is attempting to convince the public that eating our own feces and drinking our own urine is an essential part of fighting climate change.

WEF founder Klaus Schwab and his allies are determined to destroy every last pleasure known to man.

According to Yahoo.com, in the near future beer will have an extra ingredient – our own urine.

And obviously, California is fully signed up to the globalist agenda, happily agreeing to drink their own urine to fight so-called climate change.

The city of Los Angeles’ plans are even bigger than that.

The city has set out to recycle 100% of its wastewater by 2035 per a pledge made by Democrat Mayor Eric Garcetti several years ago.

In order to achieve this, LA’s Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant – which currently only treats wastewater so it’s clean enough to release into Santa Monica Bay – must be completely converted into an advanced water purification facility that produces urine that’s clean enough to consume.

What else are they going to use to wash the bugs down?

But the elite will not be happy until every last one of us is engaging in our own personal humiliation ritual, consuming our own excrement – assuming Klaus Schwab decides you are one of the lucky ones to survive the upcoming mass extinction event they keep threatening us with.

The head of the UK’s Environment Agency, who is linked to the World Economic Forum, says that common people need to be “less squeamish” about drinking “toilet-to-tap” water from sewage plants, as countries and states around the world move towards recycling sewage for human consumption, falling into lockstep with WEF ideology.

https://newsaddicts.com/wef-public-must-consume-human-waste-to-fight-climate-change/

Idaho GOP slams FBI in new resolution, calls to abolish 'this corrupt government agency' if it 'cannot be reformed'

A new resolution from the Idaho Republican Party slammed the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a "corrupt government agency" and called for its total "abolition" if it "cannot be reformed."

Last Friday and Saturday, members of the Idaho GOP met for its Summer Meeting in Challis, Idaho, in the middle of the state about 200 miles northeast of Boise. During the meeting, members discussed 26 proposed resolutions — including Resolution 2023-52, in which the Idaho Republican State Central Committee formally "condemns" the FBI.

The resolution lists a series of egregious civil rights violations, dating back to the 1950s, which the FBI has allegedly committed. Those alleged violations include:

"illegally" surveilling, infiltrating, and disrupting civil rights activists in the 1960s;

targeting "political opponents" and "other individuals considered a threat to national security";

sieging a cabin in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992, an incident "which resulted in the unnecessary deaths of Vicky and Sammy Weaver as well as a U.S. Marshal due to excessive use of force and revised rules of engagement." A family dog was also killed in the incident;

engaging in a standoff with the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, in 1993 — a standoff which ended in the violent deaths of 76 people, 25 of whom were children;

surveilling the presidential campaign of former President Donald Trump;

"essentially" entrapping the defendants in the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D);

participating in the Jan. 6 incident at the Capitol;

attempting to intimidate pro-lifers and parents attending local school board meetings;

monitoring the worship and behaviors of "the Catholic Latin Mass community"; and

raiding Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence "at the unethical, politically motivated behest of Attorney General Merrick Garland."

These actions have terrorized American citizens, the resolution stated, and undermined the trust that Americans have in their government and federal law enforcement.

Because of the FBI's "long history of misconduct," the Idaho Republican State Central Committee demanded in the resolution that FBI leaders begin implementing significant reform measures so that the agency "operates within the confines of the Constitution and respects the rights of American citizens." If such reforms are impossible, the committee "supports the abolition of this corrupt government agency."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/idaho-gop-slams-fbi-in-new-resolution-calls-to-abolish-this-corrupt-government-agency-if-it-cannot-be-reformed

McCarthy not sure Trump the strongest GOP candidate

Trump, however, threw his support behind McCarthy during his tumultuous battle for the speaker's gavel earlier this year and the congressional leader generally enjoys close ties to the former president.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on Tuesday expressed uncertainty as to former President Donald Trump's status as the strongest Republican presidential candidate this cycle.

"The question is, is he the strongest to win the election? I don’t know that answer," he said on CNBC's "Squawk Box." He did, however, acknowledge that Trump could conceivably defeat the incumbent commander-in-chief.

"Yeah, anybody can beat Biden. Can Biden beat other people? Yes, Biden can beat them. It’s on any given day," he added.

McCarthy has not officially endorsed a contender in the party's 2024 primary, which includes Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former Vice President Mike Pence, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, and a litany of others.

Trump, however, threw his support behind McCarthy during his tumultuous battle for the speaker's gavel earlier this year and the congressional leader generally enjoys close ties to the former president.

Trump currently stands as the clear front runner in the Republican primary, with 52.1% of Republicans backing him for the nomination, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/mccarthy-not-sure-trump-strongest-gop-candidate

Sergey Karaganov: Here’s why Russia has to consider launching a nuclear strike on Western Europe

If things continue as they are, Moscow will have no choice but to use the ultimate weapon

By Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow

This month, there has been an active debate in Russia about the possibility of Moscow preemptively using nuclear weapons. Which would be at variance with the established doctrine. It began after the publication of an article by Professor Sergey Karaganov, which prompted a wide response from the domestic expert community.

While Karaganov has been advocating relaxing the rules, others have different opinions: for example, Fyodor Lukyanov thinks the West cannot be 'sobered up' by using the bomb, and Ilya Fabrichnikov believes Russia should not 'take NATO's bait' and unleash the ultimate weapon.

This is Karaganov’s follow up response to his critics.

***

During over seventy years of mutual deterrence, atomic weapons have saved the world. People just took this for granted. However, now we see that things have changed and the unthinkable is happening: the West is responsible for a major war in the underbelly of a major nuclear power.

The official history of the creation of these weapons is known, but in my opinion there is also a higher power at play. It is as if the Lord God saw that a large part of humanity had gone mad, having started two world wars in a generation, and gave us these nuclear weapons, which are weapons of the apocalypse. He wanted them to be, to be in the front of our minds, at all times, and to scare us.

But now people have lost their fear.

Over the last few decades in the United States, Western Europe and even partly in Russia, what I call “strategic parasitism” has spread: the belief that there can never be a major war and that there will never be a major war. People are accustomed to peace, and it is on this basis that modern Western ideology has grown. In addition, there is now an unprecedented amount of propaganda around, to an extent unprecedented even during the Cold War.

People are simply being fed lies, and they are afraid to say what they really think. As a result of more than 70 years of peace, the public's sense of self-preservation has become dysfunctional, and it is further stifled by the extraordinarily virulent agitprop, part of which claims that Russia would never be able to attack Western Europe.

Official Western propaganda pumps the idea that the West can do anything it likes and Moscow will just put up with it. This has now become very clear and vivid.

In recent years, Russia has begun to strengthen its nuclear deterrent, but the steps taken so far are woefully inadequate. We, too, became complacent at some point, following Western theories and recklessly overestimating the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons, which the West is now exploiting, and not by accident either. The little bureaucrats there keep saying: no, the Russians will never use nuclear weapons.

They do not want to hear anything different under any circumstances, as they don’t want to interrupt their desire for an endless war in Ukraine. Because their military-industrial complex is greater than ours, they just want to wear us down.

I hope we never use nuclear weapons, but the fact that we refuse to allow their use in all situations except in the case of mortal danger to the state itself seems to me to be reckless.

The US is tying Russia's hands in this way, hoping that in the long run this long war will cause an internal implosion. And, as a result, this would radically weaken its main rival, China, which will be left to fend for itself.

This is a strategic plan that is absolutely clear.

https://www.rt.com/russia/578814-russia-has-to-consider-launching-nuclear-strike/

LAWYERS FOR EPSTEIN’S VICTIMS ASK FOR $87 MILLION IN LEGAL FEES FROM THE $290 MILLION JPMORGAN SETTLEMENT; VICTIMS COULD GET NOTHING AFTER RELEASING THEIR CLAIMS

First, the attorneys for the unnamed victims are requesting $87 million in legal fees from the $290 million settlement amount, plus another $2.5 million in expenses. The victims, on the other hand, are guaranteed no minimum monetary payment but must file a release form before they learn if they will get a dime. This language appears in the settlement documents:

“All Class Members shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Litigation concerning the Settlement (including, but not limited to, the releases provided for therein) whether favorable or unfavorable to the Class, regardless of whether such Persons seek or obtain by any means (including, without limitation, by submitting a Questionnaire and Release, or any similar document) any distribution from the Net Settlement Fund.”

The third shocking takeaway is that we could find no news story from mainstream media, which has heavily covered this story, that mentioned these and other egregious terms of the settlement.

JPMorgan was sued for facilitating Epstein’s child sex-trafficking for more than a decade by providing him with millions of dollars in hard cash from his accounts, sometimes as much as $40,000 to $80,000 a month, to pay off victims and enablers. The bank failed to file the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) that it is legally mandated to file with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Epstein’s quid pro quo with the bank included him referring valuable business deals and clients to JPMorgan Chase. These allegations were substantiated by 22 pages of internal bank emails released in a related case brought against the bank by the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands.

The law firms representing Epstein’s victims – Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and Edwards Henderson Lehrman (EHL) – filed the lawsuit on November 24, 2022. The terms of the $290 million settlement were filed on June 22 of last week. The proposed $89.5 million payday for these attorneys for seven months work comes to approximately $426,000 a day, including weekends.

The Boies and EHL law firms did bring extensive intellectual capital to the case. Attorneys at both firms have been representing Epstein victims for years. But the large sums of money they will collect under the settlement, the releases from any liability they have included in the settlement for themselves and JPMorgan’s attorneys, together with the lack of protections for the victims, should have raised red flags among the multitude of journalists who covered this story.

In addition to having to first sign a release form in order to file a claim for a monetary award with the Claims Administrator (who is also released from liability), Epstein’s victims will have to officially opt-out of this settlement in writing or be “forever” bound by its terms. Even if the victims never hear about this settlement or never receive a notice about the terms of this settlement, if they don’t opt-out in writing, they are bound by the terms of the settlement – meaning that they can’t assert their claims individually against JPMorgan Chase, its executives or personnel that covered up for Epstein, in a lawsuit of their own. The relevant section of the settlement reads:

“No Class Member is relieved from the terms of the Settlement, including the Releases provided for therein, based upon the contention or proof that such Class Member failed to receive actual or adequate notice.”

The claims that victims are releasing are sweeping in scope. The settlement includes this problematic language in one part of the release:

“This release is intended to release, to the maximum extent allowable under law, any claims, rights and causes of action against Released Defendant Parties of every nature and description…including both known and Unknown Claims…whether arising under federal law, state law, statutory law, common law, foreign law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, that could be brought to recover damages from the Released Defendant Parties on behalf of a Member of the Class by any other party, including any sovereign or government, relating to or arising from any Member of the Class’s harm, injury, abuse, exploitation, or trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein or by any person who is in any way connected to or otherwise associated with Jeffrey Epstein, as well as any right to recovery on account thereof.”

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/84979/lawyers-for-epsteins-victims-ask-for-87-million-in-legal-fees-from-the-290-million-jpmorgan.html

PLAN TO BUILD NIH-FUNDED BAT RESEARCH LAB IN COLORADO SPARKS FEARS OF LAB LEAK

Colorado State University in Fort Collins is totally stonewalling public protest over its new NIH-funded biolab and bat research facility to be completed by the end of summer 2023. CSU’s horrible track record of lab leaks in the past should be sufficient to ban it from ever conducting or being involved with gain-of-function research. ⁃ TN Editor

Colorado State University officials deny the controversial bat disease research lab will conduct gain-of-function experiments, but locals opposed to the facility cite evidence the university is already conducting risky research on deadly pathogens.

Colorado State University (CSU) is proceeding with controversial plans to construct a new research facility to study bat diseases with funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Construction is slated to be completed sometime in 2024 or 2025.

University officials and proponents of the new facility argue the laboratory is necessary to enhance research capabilities looking into emerging diseases and viruses resulting from zoonotic — animal-to-human — transfer.

While CSU denies that gain-of-function research will occur at the laboratory, some researchers connected with the new facility previously were associated with actors involved with such research, including experiments conducted in Wuhan, China.

Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois, is concerned about the facility.

Boyle told The Defender:

“It is well known that Colorado State University has a long and ongoing history of specialization in weaponizing insects with biowarfare agents for delivery to human beings.

“This new lab will magnitudinally increase CSU’s offensive biowarfare capabilities, in gross violation of the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 and my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that provides for life in prison.”

Area residents, including a local grassroots group, and bioweapons experts, also have raised concerns over the potentially risky research, involving deadly viruses, that will be conducted at the facility and the risk of a lab leak akin to that which may have occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, and may have led to escape of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Christine Bowman leads a group of local citizens who formed the Covid Bat Research Moratorium of Colorado (CBRMC), a grassroots initiative opposing the new facility. The group has launched efforts such as a yard sign campaign to raise local awareness.

In an interview with The Defender, Bowman described being “stonewalled” by state and local officials and by CSU.

“We need answers as to how COVID-19 was modified to transfer from human to human before I will be satisfied that it’s okay to raise diseased bats to study in my neighborhood,” Bowman said.

“Now that we know that the COVID pandemic likely started from a lab leak in Wuhan, China, we are questioning the safety of continuing such research,” she added.

CSU receives ‘tens of millions of dollars’ in NIH research grants annually

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/84980/plan-to-build-nihfunded-bat-research-lab-in-colorado-sparks-fears-of-lab.html

>>19085496

Most lawyers - liars take 30% in compo matters

Biological Male Transgender Activist and Triple Murderer Placed in California Women’s Prison

A dangerous biological male triple murderer has been placed in a women’s prison in California.

Dana Rivers, previously David Warfield, 68, was convicted of the 2016 triple homicide of lesbian couple Charlotte Reed and Patricia Wright and their 19-year-old son Benny Diambu-Wright at their Oakland home.

The Daily Wire reports, “The bodies of both women were found stabbed and shot with a .38 revolver, and the body of their son was found in the street with gunshot wounds. Shortly after police arrived, Rivers walked out of the house, covered in blood and reeking of gasoline. Police searched the suspect and found bullets and brass knuckles.”

According to the New York Post, “Rivers shot Charlotte Reed, 56, twice and stabbed her 40 times. Rivers shot her wife, Patricia Wright, 57, in the back and left breast and stabbed her in the neck and shoulder, and fatally shot their 19-year-old son Benny, whom the couple had adopted from Africa.”

“Rivers had been a high-profile and pioneering transgender woman, who was open about her transition in 1999, discussing it with ABC News’ 20/20 shortly after she had surgery in 2001,” the Post report noted.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/biological-male-transgender-activist-triple-murderer-placed-california/

Adam Kinzinger Admits Patriot Front Members are Feds

Quite the admission from J6 Committee member.

Actual American patriots have become fed up with the group Patriot Front crashing legitimate America First protests. Last week, patriots decided to chase Patriot Front members away from their event and, in the process of removing the unwanted guests, exposed the faces of Patriot Front members. Adam Kinzinger became angry at America First patriots for removing Patriot Front from their event. During his rant, Kinzinger admitted that Patriot Front is a fed psyop.

Video shows attendees of an America First event asking the members of Patriot Front to leave their event.

https://nationalfile.com/adam-kinzinger-admits-patriot-front-members-are-feds/

Breitbart starting to expose themselves

Rising Conservative Influencer Pedro Gonzalez Regularly Espoused Racist and Anti-Semitic Sentiments in Private Messages

Pedro Gonzalez, a rising conservative influencer and politics editor of Chronicles magazine, regularly in 2019 and 2020 sent racist and antisemitic messages, Breitbart News can reveal after reviewing months’ worth of his private messages.

More recently, Gonzalez has become perhaps most well-known as one of the most active and strident pro-Florida Gov. Ron Desantis influencers on Twitter.

“Yeah like not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are,” Gonzalez wrote in one group chat in 2019, for instance.

More

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/27/exclusive-rising-conservative-influencer-pedro-gonzalez-regularly-espoused-racist-and-anti-semitic-sentiments-in-private-messages/

"I Do Not Know The Plans of Our Govt, But It Looks Like The Extermination of Its Own Population"

“I do not know the plans of our government, but it looks like the extermination of its own population” — Ukrainian soldier on Bakhmut

As the WSJ reported last month, the Zelensky regime is drafting poor, untrained men some of whom have never held a gun and sending them straight to the frontlines to serve as cannonfodder.

On Monday, horrific video was released showing inexperienced Ukrainian soldiers with US-supplied Bradley fighting vehicles taking part in the US-backed counteroffensive getting their legs blown off while traversing a minefield.

The poor sap above can be seen jumping right onto a mine and getting his legs blown off before his comrades drag him back into their tank, leaving behind a huge trail of blood.

This war should have ended a year ago with Zelensky accepting Putin's peace deal but instead he took billions in bribes from the West to drag the war on in perpetuity.

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63839

Pandemic Leaders Were Biodefense Puppets and Profiteers

Scandalous incompetence. Profound stupidity. Astounding errors. This is how many analysts – including Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Scott Atlas, and popular Substack commentator eugyppius – explain how leading public health experts could prescribe so many terrible pandemic response policies.

And it’s true: the so-called experts certainly have made themselves look foolish over the last three years: Public health leaders like Rochelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci make false claims, or contradict themselves repeatedly, on subjects related to the pandemic response, while leading scientists, like Peter Hotez in the US and Christian Drosten in Germany, are equally susceptible to such flip-flops and lies. Then there are the internationally renowned medical researchers, like Eric Topol, who repeatedly commit obvious errors in interpreting Covid-related research studies. [ref]

All of these figures publicly and aggressively promoted anti-public health policies, including universal masking, social distancing, mass testing and quarantining of healthy people, lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

It seems like an open-and-shut case: Dumb policies, dumb people in charge of those policies.

This might be true in a few individual cases of public health or medical leaders who really are incapable of understanding even high school level science. However, if we look at leading pandemic public health and medical experts as a group – a group consisting of the most powerful, widely published, and well-paid researchers and scientists in the world – that simple explanation sounds much less convincing.

Even if you believe that most medical researchers are shills for pharmaceutical companies and that scientists rarely break new ground anymore, I think you’d be hard-pressed to claim that they lack basic analytical skills or a solid educational background in the areas they’ve studied. Most doctors and scientists with advanced degrees know how to analyze simple scientific documents and understand basic data.

Additionally, those doctors and public health professionals who were deemed experts during the pandemic were also clever enough to have climbed the academic, scientific, and/or government ladders to the highest levels.

They might be unscrupulous, sycophantic, greedy, or power-mongering. You might think they make bad moral or ethical decisions. But it defies logic to say that every single one of them understands simple scientific data less than, say, someone like me or you. In fact, I find that to be a facile, superficial judgment that does not get to the root cause of their seemingly stupid, incompetent behavior.

https://brownstone.org/articles/pandemic-leaders-were-biodefense-puppets-and-profiteers/

Think Tank Agrees to Pay More Than $500,000 to Resolve Allegations That It Falsely Certified Its Eligibility to Receive PPP Loan

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/think-tank-agrees-pay-more-500000-resolve-allegations-it-falsely-certified-its

Out-of-Touch Obama in Massive Self-Awareness Fail

The Condescender-in-Chief is at it again. Just weeks after Barack Obama — the descendent of Africans and white people — dared to criticize Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) — the descendent of actual slaves and a son of the state where the Civil War started — for being optimistic about the state of race in America today, the former president weighed in on what he thinks spurs on “right-wing populism.”

In an interview with Christiane Amanpour on CNN, Obama said, “It’s very hard to sustain a democracy when you have such massive concentrations of wealth.” He went on to blather about “ladders of opportunity” and a “stronger safety net” before concluding that “if we don’t take care of that, that’s also going to fuel the kind of mostly far-right populism, but it can also potentially come from the left, that is undermining democracy because it makes people angry and resentful and scared.”

First off, with all due respect to the Condescender-in-Chief — which is none as far as I’m concerned — we’re a republic, not a democracy. Second, it’s an awfully Marxist argument to pin the problem and solution solely on economics.

But what I want to focus on is Obama’s utter lack of self-awareness. After all, if anybody should know about “massive concentrations of wealth,” it’s Barry. As Jim Geraghty points out at National Review:

Obama and his wife signed the largest book deal in history, $65 million, for their memoirs. The Obamas signed a separate production deal with Netflix worth an estimated $50 million. The Obamas’ production company, Higher Ground, signed a $25 million deal with Spotify that lasted three years. Barack Obama reportedly makes as much as $400,000 per speech, but reportedly made almost $600,000 for speaking at a conference in Colombia. Michelle Obama makes $200,000 per appearance.

The Obamas rent a mansion in Kalorama (a neighborhood in Washington, D.C.); bought a mansion and estate in Martha’s Vineyard, Mass.; bought another house in Rancho Mirage, Calif.; and still have their old home in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago.

In April 2010, then-president Obama declared, “At a certain point, you’ve made enough money.” Apparently, Obama hasn’t reached that point yet.

The other area where Obama is showing a painful lack of self-awareness is in his estimation of the roots of populism on the right. Naturally, as someone who sat at the feet of socialists for much of his formative years, Obama defaults to the economic reasons, with big government and the redistribution of wealth (someone else’s, not his own) as the solution, but what he either ignores or doesn’t realize is that one of the main catalysts for right-leaning populism is people’s belief that their government is against them. And we have Barack Obama to thank for laying that foundation.

President Gun-to-a-Knife-Fight is the Godfather of the division and weaponized government that Joe Biden turned into an ugly art form, and he did so without any pretense of being a man of the people like Lunchbucket Joe. This is the man who, in his first campaign for the White House, decried the peons who “get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

This is the president who sicced the IRS and other federal agencies on conservatives with abandon. Joe Biden merely told his old boss, “Hold my, um, well, you know, the drink thing.” We mustn’t forget that this current strain of populism on the right came about largely as a result of Barack Obama and his policies. He lacks enough self-awareness to realize it himself.

https://pjmedia.com/columns/chris-queen/2023/06/27/barack-obama-suffers-from-an-obvious-lack-of-self-awareness-n1706593