Wait for it . . .
>>19087838 ty for the bread
it seems fraudulent to me to post q posts and highlight them with bold and red text to present them in a way that Q never intended.
The Boston Herald will end the 'comments' (which are provided by a third party) on July 1 (Saturday) and say it will 'dramatically speed up' the content when viewed on mobile apps.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/06/27/the-boston-herald-is-ending-comments-july-1-heres-why/
often locals will give insight into stories that doesn't get provided without the comments.
but too often it's just like shills who post here where it's someone trying to dominate the conversation and chase everyone else away.
I can love Roseanne and still know she has issues.
and I don't agree with everything she says, and obviusly when she says that stuff like she did the other day she's doing a persona, a bit.
I guess as a long time fan of hers I understood she would play a character. Like when she did the character singing the National Anthem. I knew she was doing a parady of a pitcher. She didn't spit because she dislikes the national Anthem, she did it because baseball players chewed tabacco and would sometimes spit.
and as far as her latest rant: don't we all know that she identifies as being Jewish, and takes it very seriously? I guess maybe I've listened to her when she wasn't doing a bit and know this.
the troubling thing for me is all the parrots who will cancel anyone who says anything that some in the media deem to be 'bad'.
there is never any 'take it in context' or 'well, I don't agree with her but I still care about her' it becomes 'anyone who still won't condemn her is as bad as the persona she is playing.'
as if because I choose to still care and pray and think of her fondly (despite her times when she does a disagreeable bit) that I am a hater who hates all people of some ethnicity.
that's slander but it rolls right off the tonques of those who buy into the cancel culture ideology.
the problem with cancel culture is eventually everyone gets cancelled.
Roseanne has issues, and everyone knows that.
If she says outragious things we have to understand that she's a performer and she also has a tendency to do a turret's syndrome bit, where she says outragous things to trigger people to get a response.
in this case she's triggered the cancel culture people and they are gleeful with their hatchets.
even I, who do not do the turrets bit, am told by some shill that I hate all . . . .
as bad as she seems when she's doing the Turret's bit, the people who want to elliminate her are worse. They have not love, nor forgiveness, nor humor left in their hearts.
they shoudl know she's not a hater by her behavior and her reputation and the good she's done. Her occasional seeming cray-cray is to be expected because we know her, and she does that from time to time.
but they want her gone because they want the world to be a pleasant place for them even if it means destroying everyone else who dares to question any of their assumptions.
She's being bold and questioning assumptions and they simply can't have it.
I date the demise of anything new or cutting edge on the Internet to 2007 or so.
one day suddenly all the non profits and government agencies had to have either Twitter or Facebook.
and they just stopped trying to do webpages after that.
there was all kinds of very cool animation that could be done with CSS and javascript, and everyone just stopped doing it.
nothing was new, no new web pages, it was all suddenly having to be an 'app' and it had to run on 'Android' (which was just a port of Linux with root acesss prohibited).
as soon as Android became the thing, and apps, 'Internet' was not supported and the Javascript / CSS thing was no longer promoted.
you could still do it, no one would link your pages. Personal web pages would not get linked. Google stopped being a search engine and stopped listing content that wasn't sanctioned.
there are other things too, like 'Linked in' was the only way to get a job after that too.
basically the players said 'it is our stuff or nothing'.
not the only way to get a job, but the only way to get a well paying corporate job. (not technically correct, but seems to be that if you didn't use Linked in you were shut out of very many jobs).
I see we have the 'if you don't agree with me you are as bad as they are' shill doing his redtext accusatory postings condemning everyone and everything.
two pillars is a very common theme in architecture. It is often that two are placed on either side of a doorway or entrance.
just because there are two pillars doesn't mean it's a cult or a ritual.
you make up fake reveals, and do bogus presentations of fact, as if it's meaningful, but ignore the history of architecture.
it used to be that the BV's would tolerate that but now they have a very low tolerance for any discussions of certain groups and people.
it's just what these breads have morphed into.
also your analysis is bogus, but that is beside the point.
the totalitarian mindset thinks it's perfectly reasonable to be a bigot and to slander anyone who goes off message.
> a89681
ah the 'foreign bigot' persona.
smug and projecting it's own qualities onto another nation, supposedly.
so you follow the links?
what if it leads you to something and then you get arrested for it? what then?
making stuff up.
yup, you're here just to stir up discord.
got it.
please do not respond back. I get what you're doing.
> b6cb9e
spamming is one of the things that gets people removed.
the BV even warned one of them about having too many posts.
they have a rule, which isn't always enforced, that if you hit 10% of the posts in a bread you get deleted.
the spammers know this.
anyone ?
how so?
it's a board that has rules.
if you follow the rules most of the time you'll be fine.
can I point to it?
I think you could look for yourself. Look to the 'frequently asked questions'
isn't the BO posting in the bread.
ask him. It's their rule not mine.
PS: painting over graffiti is not 'destruction of artwork' and board moderation to allow for reasonable rules is not censorship.
the decor in a bar suits the owners of the bar.
so talk to Board Owner if you don't like the policies.
as far as your 'leads to corruption'?
what kind of corruption?
I didn't make the rules, and these aren't the rules that I'd have but they are the rules.
and yes, the BV sometimes make mistakes and some of them are boastful when they delete you and like to do the told-you-so kind of boast scold asserting their dominance. Yes, it's distasteful but it is the way that the board is.
I'm not a BV or the BO so ask them to show you where they have posted those rules.
once again fake reveal with bogus information.
A Podesta was what the mayor-equivalent in an Tuscan city was called.
>19088389
>19088405
>19088414
look how upset they get when faced with the realities of a moderated board.
they want their poison pen messaging to rule the breads and can't follow the rules.
and so I just tell them what I know and instead of being 'oh, thank you.' they act as if I'm a devil.
this is a bread that is owned by a Board Owner and he gets to decide, not me.
if you have issues, talk to him about it.
you all know that you do stuff to push the envelop. your purpose is discord and disharmony to disrupt the board.
and the Board Owner and the BV, imperfect as they are, try to do a job to mitigate the toxic effect of the three of you.
and they allow a lot, and do have rules.
and whatever rule they make you make sure to break it and poke the bear.
that's what you are: instigators and disrupters.
and PS: you pretend to believe in free speech but in fact your purpose is to flood the board with nonsense (so it seems) to drive away sane voices and then be the only voices here.
Censorship through nonsense shilling, censorship through information overload.
PS: there is not political message presented by porn, especially the CP version of it, and thus it isn't really anything that you should carry on about as if we're silencing your rights by saying 'stop with it'.
the pretense that deleting CP is an eggrigious violation of the first amendment is a loathsome idea, and designed to just further the discord and further disrupt the channel.
you guys are most likely paid shills and probably follow psychological hazing guidelines in everything you do here. You have methods to gain control of free speech venues and silence them. Porn is one of the tools you use to do this, especially the CP variety.
I pointed out your 10% rule and got a lot of response.
can you please explain it or link to it for those who are hassling me over that?
TY.
a litany of slander, anon.
one of the clear tells for a board shill is that they are here to silence all other voices.
they will do whatever they know how to do to slander and defame, and try and humiliate and shame, any other voice on the board.
they use images that are distasteful that are also unkind to those portrayed.
It's like they are stuck in that 8th grade middle school mean-kid mindset.
It doesn't matter what your opinion is, it will never pass their test unless it's just flatery designed to lead you down and then to stick the knife in later.
they don't care what you say, they just want you to shut up and leave the board to them.
they never concede, they are never kind, they always continue through out the bread if you keep on posting. They will IP hop and do confirmation shilling. They do everything, every rule of debate disruption, to attack.
and they have no remorse.
nor do they ever post any digs or have anything other than the equivalent of throwing stones.
nothing you do will ever be good enough for them.
they don't learn, they don't grow, they don't repent.
they might say, when they grow tired, "only kidding' or "i was just joking". Or 'you misunderstand'.
they hope to be so toxic that they drive you away.
I'm not the one deleting it, anon.
so why are you throttling your message in my direction?
There is the actual BO in the bread.
why aren't you discussing this with him?
TY!
board disruptors are real
rules that work are hard to craft.
and no matter what the rules are the disruptor is also a tweeker who will always push the envelop.
you know this. that's why you keep it up.
you simply don't care about doing research or discussing issues. you are only here to waste our time (it seems to me).