ChatGPT working overtime I see…
>Why so threatened
Why do you assume fear in my post stating simple facts. I use ChatGPT every day, either you are using it too, or your write your poems as generic as it does.
I, unlike other anons here, don't mind your shitposts. I rarely read them though, hope your not offended.
>fair enough removing the cp,
They don't even have to remove the cp posts.
They could just scrub the link and clear the picture. Instead of fucking with the post count, while also being transparent about what was editted.
But deleting posts is easier because they can use it as cover to delete other 'undesirables'.
I'm like 85% sure that BO and/or BVs is responsible for the pedo posts when they need an excuse to delete something.
cute how floating my own free thoughts gets me accused of being a FED
>19088339
Right on cue
>The BVs are men of honor.
>There must be 45 anon posts (no cp) removed in this thread alone
I kekked
>they have a rule, which isn't always enforced, that if you hit 10% of the posts in a bread you get deleted.
Can you point to where this is a board rule?
Giving anyone the ability to remove posts arbitrarily leads to corruption.
Ding ding ding.
>anyone ?
>how so?
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
>if you follow the rules most of the time you'll be fine.
So where is that entry in the board rules I asked for?
>isn't the BO posting in the bread.
Yup. And now he's leaving cp up, while anons complain about it.
>ask him. It's their rule not mine.
You're the one claiming stuff not him.
>PS: painting over graffiti is not 'destruction of artwork' and board moderation to allow for reasonable rules is not censorship.
Depends on the perspective, in both cases.
>the decor in a bar suits the owners of the bar.
Ah the twitter defence… Yeah, no. This is a public platform, ownership is a proforma thing and nothing else.
>as far as your 'leads to corruption'?
>what kind of corruption?
Uhm? Are you really that stupid? What are we talking about right now?
Deletion of arbitrary posts.
>I didn't make the rules, and these aren't the rules that I'd have but they are the rules.
No, you are just an authoritarian that likes following rules without question. You'd been a good Nazi.
>and yes, the BV sometimes make mistakes
You mean like how the Pentagon sometimes makes mistakes and loses $6.2billion?
>Repeating the same message over and over again is MKU technique
Nope… It's a propaganda technique.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" - Joseph Goebbels
>They know how to research and how to draw their own conclusions.
Exactly. So no need to remove.
>That is why it's SPAM and why it is removed.
Non sequitur is non sequitur.
Kek
>one of the clear tells for a board shill is that they are here to silence all other voices.
Ironic when we are talking about deletion of posts. Kek
Who's silencing who?
>so why are you throttling your message in my direction?
You post, I reply.
>There is the actual BO in the bread.
>why aren't you discussing this with him?
You think I can't reply to other anons while also replying to you?
>not a hard and fast rule
Arbitrary rules are arbitrary.
>shills want to live to live forever in the archives?
I have no idea what shills want.
>post something not spammy
So arguing my point of view is spam now. Kek.
So by your logic my posts are now valid for deletion right?
>board disruptors are real
Agreed.
>rules that work are hard to craft.
Agreed.
>and no matter what the rules are the disruptor is also a tweeker who will always push the envelop.
Sure. But rule by decree and against the wishes of the users is disruptive too.
Having arbitrary rules like the one BO just mentioned; A 'not hard and fast' 10% rule opens the door for deleting actual anon posts based on BOs feelings and excused by the 10% rule for example.
This is not sustainable. And leads to theories of corruption by the leadership among anons. Especially in the light of what has happened this bread.
>you know this. that's why you keep it up.
And that's where the discussion ends by you baselessly claiming that I am one of the said disrupters. And not BO having these authoritarian rules. Kek.
I like spam being removed. I don't like that the ability enables deletion of real posts.
I prefer spam persisting if it means the chance of a real post being deleted is diminished.
We have a filter.