Could the scientific method be complete crap in real world situations? Think of early man out on the plains. If early man noticed a child get bitten by a venomous snake and then swell up and die or suffer pain and disability for a while, would he turn around and say to his tribe members: " Lets get 100 children and put 50 of them in a corral with venomous snakes and 50 in a corral without. Which ones will swell up?" NO.

Those type of "experiments" aren't for the real world. To survive people need to make an instant judgments. We don't have the ability when it comes to survival to keep "testing".

Example: Bill Gates stated in George magazine that he was into "population control". Now we see anything he's involved with result in death and disability. We have enough evidence to say he shouldn't be messing around with mosquitoes (living hypodermics) or vaccines!

>>19095865

Yes, I think this is a good analysis of the purpose of the work.

>>19095880

>Mental breakdown

When I started to grasp the truth I went somewhat mad and I was hospitalized. Many times.

>>19095887

>assign responsibility and identify possible co-conspirators.

Fair. One hypothesis of mine is that mosquitoes that carry malaria are favored by the removal of other types via the GMO release. Another unrelated hypothesis is that hundreds of thousands of migrants are bringing malaria with them. Another is an intentional CDC/DoD release.

>>19095902

>wildly speculative

Yes it is open to "wildly speculative answers". However, I don't think my experience is wildly speculative because it happened to me.

>>19095943

>The things that cause one person to break down might have little or no effect on another.

I think it tore me apart because it had to do with my own children and anon was completely unprotected (or so I thought). Example: Take child to doctor and encountered incredible sense of evil, like under satanic attack. My soul knew there was something really wrong, but anon was not yet informed. Spouse at the time was not impacted and kept pushing the things anon could sense would lead to harm and evil.

>>19095973

Some of the things that bothered me:

1. In about 2006 got a printer and read the "agreement". There was a section dealing with "hate speech". I knew where that was going 17 years ago!

1. About 2007/2008 realized game comms had serious problems: Children getting talked to by strangers. Also the avatars created and the possibility of people playing "the other gender" freaked me out. Second Life was really, really bad news (found out the hard way).

1. Vaccines, vaccines, vaccines! Why so many, why pushed so hard. Medicaid made sure you WOULD get all of them. Why?!

1. Food. Anon developed food issues. Now it seems I could discern the poisoning.

1. Taking children to dentists got really problematic. All this "signing" of forms. HIPPA crap-which is NOT about privacy but about making sure your information is available for analysis by others.

1. Blood samples from newborns: Collect genetic data on all infants. (Were some chipped?) Idk.

Anon could go on and on.

4.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Walter-Quattrociocchi

"In this study, we aim to reconstruct the connectivity patterns within nations shaping news propagation globally in 2022."

Remember Cambridge Analytica?