But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Seriously, what was/were the reason(s) for Musk to approve blocking all Twitter content behind 'must have account' firewall?
Anon isn't looking for character smears or vague general attacks on Musk, I'm trying to figure out the strategic/business reasons.
Maybe, JUUUUUST maybe, Musk is dismantling the company on purpose, because from a business perspective it seems to be a terribly bad decision.
>"Affirmative action understands this and uses race-based policies to undo the effects of racist policies"
You can't solve racism with racism. Affirmative action isn't 'undoing centuries of racism'.., it PERPETUATES AND PROLONGS IT.
Proof is that there are exactly ZERO, NADA, ZILCH descriptions from the sources of this narrative of what the end state is to look like that then justifies ending affirmative action 'at the right time'.
There isn't any, it's another 'SELF-PERPETUATING' implementation of racism. That's precisely why it took the supreme court to correctly declare it is unconstitutional. Without that decision, 'affirmative action', because it is itself derived from the same power and racist dynamics as what it is asserted as allegedly seeking to stop, would and already has created NEW instances of racism against innocent people.
Nobody today applying to or going to college were ever slave owners, why are today's children targeted to suffer the sins of who are in many cases the sins of the slave owner ancestors of Democrats?
>From one perspective, it's just fucking money
How does this make more money for Twitter?
Some people did something.
And we're back
The tragic irony is that 'affirmative action' in Universities was doubly destructive AGAINST the people whose races were to be given mandatory/beyond merit approvals in applications.
Since the whole point of affirmative action was to artificially boost successful applications beyond what would have occurred under merit based system alone (nobody can deny that this MUST logically be the impact, otherwise there would be no point to imposing it as policy in the first place), it resulted in decades of American Universities producing graduates who are LESS COMPETITIVE on the world stage, which reduced domestic productivity (to the extent that intellectual prowess is correlated with technological and productive advancements), which in the aggregate REDUCES the standard of living of not just the 'targeted' races, but the entire country, indeed the world.
Repressing the current generation of talent by selection based on appearances and not ability, regardless of its intent to 'undo centuries of racism', not only cannot fix the identified problem, it makes it WORSE.
From a purely economic standpoint, there is little to no difference between intellectually substandard candidate students cheating in order to get into elite colleges, and morally bankrupt elite colleges intentionally selecting intellectually substandard candidate students.
The outcome is fraud. Employers are defrauded, and consumers are defrauded.
This is easy to prove to even the worst racists among the advocates. Just tell them to imagine taking affirmative action to the extreme, where even they would have to admit that the only benefit is the short term benefit of the students who are selected based on their appearance, with long term destruction and costs on everyone the world over.
Just tell them to imagine what would happen if over the last few centuries instead of race, there were conflicts and division based on height, or hair color, or eye color, or some other appearance. If Universities were to start selecting and approving candidates because they have the 'right' hair color, or height, or weight, to 'undo' centuries of repression of people based on one or more of those categories, then surely the quality of graduates would decline. You'd have to be a moron to deny this.
Well, same fucking thing happens for any other appearance selection criteria that flaunts merit, talent, and intelligence in the face. Quality declines.
Since Universities and Colleges are literally the highest level of educational institutions that train and teach the next generations in MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE, ENGINEERING, BIOLOGY, TRANSPORATION SAFETY, MILITARY DEFENSE, MANUFACTURING, EVERYTHING, the end result is a poorer humanity, a poorer society, more poverty, and more deaths.
Torba is a MOS asset whose intent is to incite division between Christians and Jews.
No, it was Margaret Sanger who started Planned Parenthood, as a eugenics program targeting blacks.
https://sites.smith.edu/making-democracy-real/the-negro-project/
As if your muhjoo meme.
Define 'Jew' please.
o7
Planned Parenthood: "Virginity is a social construct"
(This is a dog whistle for pedophilia)
https://nitter.net/ALEXNEWMAN_JOU/status/1674764469174411265#m
Nice projection of your projecting of your projection.
Ah yes, Anon sees the same pattern from the jealous rants of Satanists who are trying to defeat God by attacking everything they believe are closest to God: children, Jews, churches, unity, peace.
It's an old stale rant pattern.
Come on muhjoo, do better, time's running out.
Sauce please.
>https://news.yahoo.com/trump-hits-panic-button-antisemitic-094502951.html
Yahoo has no sauce.
>Chauncey DeVega
>https://news.yahoo.com/trump-hits-panic-button-antisemitic-094502951.html
This article is ITSELF a 'hitting of the panic button'.
It's the same desperate pattern of baseless accusations using the same desperate word choices:
>"the traitor ex-president railed against special counsel Jack Smith with racist and antisemitic tropes and stereotypes"
"trope" check
"stereotypes" check
>"Notably, Trump's criticism of Smith included the antisemitic "globalist" terminology"
Kek, this assertion is ITSELF a smear and slander against Jews!
If person A says 'criminal', and person B says 'stop saying criminal, it's anti-black and racist!', then it's person B introducing racism not A.
Similarly, if in response to 'globalist', "Chris Walker" from Truthout IS HIMSELF INTRODUCING VICIOUS ANTI-SEMITIC narrative.
>"Trump's fundraising emails and other communications are also filled with antisemitic themes"
"themes" another check
>"Donald Trump and other leading Republicans have associated with and given other aid and comfort to neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other antisemites."
Kek, even fake news had to apologize for pushing this lie, this…trope, hahahaha
>"At the Guardian, Moustafa Bayoumi summarizes:
>"Who remembers how, in 2018 and just days before the deadliest attack on Jewish people in US history, a prominent US politician tweeted: "We cannot allow Soros, Steyer, and Bloomberg to BUY this election!"? The tweet was widely – and correctly – understood as dangerously antisemitic"
…'and correctly'…kek, notice the desperation AND PROJECTION of equating 'buying elections' with 'anti-semitism.'
IT'S THEIR OWN PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTIONS ALLLLLL THE WAY DOWN HAHAHAHA
"IN THE PUBLIC MIND, CONSTANTLY ASSOCIATE THOSE WHO OPPOSE US WITH THOSE NAMES THAT ALREADY HAVE A BAD SMELL."
This is precisely why the muhjoos muhjoo on QR, despite there being dedicated muhjoo boards on 8kun.
They are scared shitless of the great awakening reaching the 'public mind'.
>demons
Oh there are demons alright, but you're not going to find the source in religions like Judaism, or Christianity, or Islam.
You're going to find it in those individuals who see themselves as Gods, and abuse children of any and every religious background.
Tick tock.
Kek, the muhjoos really are scared so shitless they're triggered into projecting their own projections this thread.