Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 12:10 p.m. No.19100612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0620 >>0645 >>0703

Supreme Court blocks student loan forgiveness in blow to Biden. Here's what to know about the ruling. By Melissa Quinn Updated on: June 30, 2023 / 12:55 PM / CBS News 1/2

 

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday invalidated President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, ruling that a 2003 federal law does not allow the program to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in debt.

 

The 6-3 decision by the court's conservative majority derails a major campaign pledge from the president, denying relief to roughly 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt wiped away under the plan.

 

In a statement, the president said he believed the decision was "wrong" and "disappointing." He said he will address the nation Friday afternoon and lay out "more detail on all that my Administration has done to help students and the next steps my Administration will take."

 

"I will stop at nothing to find other ways to deliver relief to hard-working middle-class families," Mr. Biden said. "My Administration will continue to work to bring the promise of higher education to every American."

The court's student loan ruling

 

Before striking down the plan, the Supreme Court first said Missouri, one of the six states that challenged the lawfulness of the plan, had the right to sue, known as legal standing. That finding allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education had the power to forgive student loan debt under a law known as the HEROES Act.

 

The court, in a majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, said the law does not grant the secretary that authority.

 

"We hold today that the act allows the secretary to 'waive or modify' existing statutory or regulatory provisions applicable to financial assistance programs under the Education Act, not to rewrite that statute from the ground up," Roberts wrote.

 

The court invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."

 

The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure."

 

"Today, we have concluded that an instrumentality created by Missouri, governed by Missouri, and answerable to Missouri is indeed part of Missouri; that the words 'waive or modify' do not mean 'completely rewrite'; and that our precedent — old and new—requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department Secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy," he concluded.

 

Roberts ended his opinion by noting that the disagreement among the court's members should not be mistaken for disparagement. "It is important that the public not be misled either," he cautioned. "Any such misperception would be harmful to this institution and our country."

 

Justice Elena Kagan authored the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson and summarized from the bench. "In every respect, the court today exceeds its proper, limited role in our nation's governance," she wrote.

 

The dissenting justices split from the majority regarding not only the legality of the relief plan, but also with its finding that the states had the right to sue. In deciding the case at all, Kagan said the court overreached.

 

"The result here is that the Court substitutes itself for Congress and the Executive Branch in making national policy about student-loan forgiveness," Kagan said.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/student-loans-supreme-court-forgiveness-decision-ruling/

Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 12:11 p.m. No.19100620   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19100612

2/2

In a separate opinion, the Supreme Court unanimously said a pair of Texas borrowers who also challenged the program lacked standing to bring their suit, and tossed out their case.

 

Mr. Biden is expected to announce new actions to protect borrowers, according to a White House official.

 

The student loan relief plan

The decision from the high court is a major defeat for Mr. Biden as he pursues reelection. He pledged during his 2020 campaign that his administration would forgive at least $10,000 of federal student loan debt.

 

Mr. Biden moved to fulfill that promise last August, when he announced his plan to forgive up to $10,000 in student debt for eligible borrowers earning less than $125,000 annually. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, who are students with the greatest financial need, would have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.

 

Roughly 40 million Americans were eligible for the relief announced by the president last August, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased altogether, according to White House estimates. More than 26.2 million people applied for the program, and over 16 million of those applications were approved before the Department of Education was forced to stop accepting applications due to the legal challenges.

 

The Trump and Biden administrations paused federal student-loan payments during the COVID-19 pandemic, and borrowers will resume making payments this fall.

 

The Department of Education relied on the 2003 HEROES Act as its legal justification for wiping out roughly $430 billion in debt. The law authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.

 

Legal challenges

A group of six red states — Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri and South Carolina — as well as the two borrowers from Texas filed two separate lawsuits, arguing the debt relief exceeded the administration's authority.

 

In the challenge from the states, a federal district court in St. Louis dismissed the case, finding they did not have the legal standing to bring the suit. But an appeals court blocked the loan forgiveness program, finding that Missouri was harmed from the financial losses the debt cancellation inflicts.

 

The appeals court focused its decision on the Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri, or MOHELA, a state-created entity that services federal student loans, finding that the financial impact on the loan servicer due to the debt discharge threatened financial harm to Missouri.

 

For the second case from Texas brought by borrowers Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor, dubbed Dept. of Education v. Brown, a federal district court found the borrowers satisfied the requirements for standing and ruled the plan is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's legislative power. A federal appeals court declined to reinstate the program.

 

Brown does not qualify for debt relief, as her loans are held by commercial entities, and Taylor is eligible for $10,000 in loan forgiveness.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/student-loans-supreme-court-forgiveness-decision-ruling/

Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 12:32 p.m. No.19100703   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19100612

Attached is the whole document with the final decision.

Court Opinion portion:

The authority to “modify” statutes and regulations allows the Secretary tomake modest adjustmentsand additions to existing provisions, not transform them. Prior to the COVID–19 pandemic, “modifications”

issued under the Act were minor and had limited effect. But the “modifications” challenged herecreate a novel and fundamentally different loan forgiveness program. While Congress specified in the Education Act a few narrowly delineated situations that could qualify a borrower

for loan discharge, the Secretary has extended such discharge to nearly

every borrower in the country. It is “highly unlikely that Congress” authorized such a sweeping loan cancellation program “through such a subtle device as permission to ‘modify.’ ” Id., at 231.

 

The Secretary responds that the Act authorizes him to “waive” legal provisions as well as modify them—and that this additional term “grant[s] broader authority” than would “modify” alone. But the Secretary’s invocation of the waiver power here does not remotely resemble how it has been used on prior occasions, where it was simply used

to nullify particular legal requirements.The Secretary next argues that the power to “waive or modify” is greater than the sum of its parts: Because waiver allows the Secretary “to eliminate legal obligations in their entirety,” the combination of “waive or modify” must allow him “to reduce them to any extent short of waiver” (even if the power to “modify” ordinarily does not stretch that far). But the challenged loan forgiveness program goes beyond even that.

 

In essence, theSecretary has drafteda new section of the Education Act from scratch by “waiving” provisions root and branch and then filling the empty space with radically new text.

Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 1 p.m. No.19100856   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19100750

These two have every scam down that is possible. I want this whole shit to be over with, I'm sick of these people telling the public "tough Shit and Fuck You!" we'll do whatever we like even though it's illegal. And Kemp appointed his bestie bud in the GBI, so they work together for human trafficking through the city. Is there any state that is even halfway honest?

Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 1:04 p.m. No.19100868   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0897

>>19100830

Well that's odd based on Trump being accused of showing War plans for IRAN, how did they find out.It's almost like everything they are about to caught with, they accuse Trump a few days in advance so this kind of news of overlooked

Anonymous ID: 27ea89 June 30, 2023, 1:14 p.m. No.19100911   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19100739

So true and what is happening is Muslims are coming out to defend Christians and Catholics in American, along with protesting at schools because of all the LGBTQ shit. The masses will be more united due to this transgression of God's laws. May they all burn in hell, pushing this perversion. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah and the multiple other times God punished and eliminated even his children for perversion.

 

End times type of stuff coming up, I'm not saying it's the end times (because no one knows how long that it), I'm saying "they" are going too far and fast, and there's a point in which when "their" judgement comes, it will be massive and ugly.