>>19108961 pb
>It's a cited paper, Anon.
pick ANY subject and i'll find 100 cited papers that agree, and 100 cited papers that disagree.
have you spent 50 yrs reading scientific journals? cause if you did, you'd know one paper doesn't mean jackshit.
>>19108961 pb
>It's a cited paper, Anon.
pick ANY subject and i'll find 100 cited papers that agree, and 100 cited papers that disagree.
have you spent 50 yrs reading scientific journals? cause if you did, you'd know one paper doesn't mean jackshit.
>eat your greens
but never forgetโฆ
if it smells good, eat it
if it smells bad, just fuck it
>if anyone studies statistics
it would shock the average person to know just how FEW "scientists" actually have an thorough understanding of statistics.
the same even applies to most mathematicians, outside of the few who specialize in prob&stat
>neither does your opinion or your ad hominin or your argument from authority, Anon.
i did not state any opinions
i made no ad hominem attack
i made no appeal to authority
on the other hand, YOUR post is an appeal to anti-authority, is passive-aggresive ad hominem, and is nothing BUT opinion
>'Haass' is Germanish for Rabbit.
*Hasenpfeffer
>Space people trying to save us from ourselves by helping us raise our vibes and shit.
put the ~~comic books~~ graphic novels down, and step away from the keyboard.