BAKER
I'd like to ask you what the rational is behind
>>1911117 #2407
at the bottom of notables?
I'm seriously curious about why you do that. I'm not criticizing, I'm just wondering what the editorial rational is behind this.
ThanQ
>Adding that one post greatly eases the browsing in the previous bread
> anons like to browse previous breads
I do not see the utility of it you can follow any link in the notables and you will end up in that bread.
If you follow a link to
>>1910791 POTUS statment on SCOTUS ruling
you end up in #2407 just as if you'd followed
>>1911117 #2407
and when you get to
you'll find a link to
in that post.
Oh well, a matter of editorial taste I suppose.
godspeed BAKER
wwg1wga