>>1911013 (last)
Will look into
>>1911037 (last)
Well that'd be one hell of a job. It's 500+ pages long with 800+ images. I believe I actually tried replacing a few .png's with .jpeg's as a trial and I don't remember any difference but I'll definitely try it again.
When I save a screenshot as .png I do: PrintScreen key -open MS Paint -> paste -> save
Doing the .jpeg I would do: PrintScreen key -open Adobe PS -> paste -> save with max quality (and like I said I don't believe it worked but I'll try again)
I think I also tried saving them as .png's in Photoshop and I got the same result.
>>1911077 (last)
Thanks a lot for the input anon
But it's almost like the viewers/browsers have built-in smoothing algorithms or something. Look at this pic. Compare Google Chrome vs Microsoft Edge. Same file, both viewed at 100%. The Chrome one looks to me like it has vertical blur where the Edge one looks like horizontal blur. Definite differences between the two. And they look exactly the same when you zoom in a lot, when they should look different because they look different at 100%. But I don't know, it's strange. I'll continue trying to solve it. Thanks for the inputs anons