like the dash
why
when anon did notables, anon would put title and some short insight into post.
there is no hard and fast rule about how to construct notes as long as it is not shills or untrustyworthy sources.
like the dash
why
when anon did notables, anon would put title and some short insight into post.
there is no hard and fast rule about how to construct notes as long as it is not shills or untrustyworthy sources.
sounds like something anon just read but opposite.
There is a simple answer to the below.
never trust liars
-----
The liar paradox.
The liar paradox is a paradox in philosophy and logic that arises when a liar states that they are lying. If the liar is indeed lying, then the liar is telling the truth, which means the liar just lied.3 The paradox is also known as Epimenides' paradox, derived from the statement attributed to the Cretan prophet Epimenides that all Cretans are liars.1 Such paradoxes are often analyzed by creating "metalanguages" to separate statements into different levels on which truth and falsity can be assessed independently.0 Some philosophers have concluded that there must be a hierarchy of languages, and that the words "true" and "false" as applied to statements in any given language are themselves words belonging to a language of higher order.2
kek
swordy