Anonymous ID: da6b76 July 3, 2023, 6:20 a.m. No.19115278   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5282 >>5284 >>5286 >>5289 >>5312

>>19115269

what's amazing to me is how this shill effort at mocking Q and selective repost of Q is done by the team of mocking shills and they never break the illusion of their (false) virtue.

It like someone who uses feces as makeup and pretends that no one notices.

in one sense me pointing it out is kind-of silly because it's so obvious to me what it going on.

on the off chance that it's not obvious to others, I suppose? or just the revulsion of being directed by mockers to 'obey' 'your' direction, so early in the bread.

 

it's so obvious that maybe it's useless to point it out but look how much foaming and lathering of the mouths I cause by doing it.

Anonymous ID: da6b76 July 3, 2023, 7:30 a.m. No.19115620   🗄️.is 🔗kun

the hard core efforts at subverting the board waned for a while.

but last night at about midnight the effort kicked up again, and since then it's been a shill team flooding the bread with their operational clown-show psyops.

 

Is it France?

Is it the full moon?

The first of the month, the start of a new fiscal year?

My quess is a new team was passed the effort to shill these breads, just as in 2020 a new team showed up the week of July 1.

Also a lot of the comments are gone at local newspaper websites and

Twitter isn't working correctly.

so many resources that would be used to shill the comment sections of local newspapers are freed up to shill elsewhere.

and since Twitter is gone . . . is this the only place left?

 

New team, using the same tactics? Or old team with new funding?

I say that the old team has new funding.

fiscal year change for some, a new quarter. Monies freed up.

 

Ukraine is falling.

France is transitioning to a sixth Republic (it seems) which could take months or years.

 

So the tired shills are here in force with their constant drip drip drip of lying points, and partial histories that ignore most groups in history, and focus on some few.

with the easy and maniputlative 'It's the somebodys' gloss over.

and the 'your oath' mocking, and selective quoting of Q . . . trying to get people to 'rise up' and 'do something' while they get paid over a holiday weekend for being here.

maybe it's not a holiday weekend where they are.

 

also we have the full moon today, and that usually gets some people in a tizzy.

 

anyway, we seem to be at a peak of foul shilling today.

Anonymous ID: da6b76 July 3, 2023, 7:56 a.m. No.19115755   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5768

>>19115736

the 10 percent of posts rule is a loose rule.

that wasn't the reason that the posts were deleted.

obviously we know that the posts were deleted for the same reason that they were deleted all the other times that quality of post was flooded into the bread.

and then they cry 'muh censorship' when what they do is 'censorship through information overload' where only their (foul and false) messaging is allowed.

Anonymous ID: da6b76 July 3, 2023, 8:18 a.m. No.19115882   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19115768

how am I that?

I observe and report what I see here.

do I delete it? no.

I filter it because it's loathsome repetitious shilling that shows up pretty much every day.

I don't support censorship, nor do I like that your kind of posting triggers others into doing it.

no, playing the victim is what you do.

Anonymous ID: da6b76 July 3, 2023, 8:39 a.m. No.19115988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6015

>>19115750

to be clear:

'hate speech' deletion is censorship.

deleting spam, not so much becuase they've already said it over and over and the purpose of it is to censor everyone else by overload of useless information.

as odious as some posts are they are there as a result of someone's urges.

and the term 'hate speech' is manufactured to shut up others.