regarding placebo batches
I experienced first hand that a whole clinic pharmacy got shot, and only one of these people didn't have any adverse effect, and it was someone even with Diabetes Type II, and other pre-existing issues, others were healthy and still got demolished.
I read the "debunk" article, but I don't see it debunking anything, because first of all it's all assumptions.
"well maybe all these bad batches were injected into elderly"
Can this be verified? No, thanks to lack of data.
"well there are some adverse events recorded for the good batches"
Also assumption, not ever recorded event has to be an actual event relevant to the shot.
Heck, even if there was data. You think criminals would give us correct data?
"well let's assume that every lot is the same size"
She can't even make sure that that's accurate, at least admits that she doesn't know..
And why would I trust VAERS in the first place?
Isn't it even the case that everyone can enter data in there?
Maybe someone added fake data on there so that it looks like other lots are bad too?
The problem overall is that there is so much data missing and there also being inaccurate data, that it is impossible to figure out something based on that data. It's all guess-work and assumptions.
The so called "yellow lots" could even be split into 2, like 1 part placebo, and one part low dosage poison, or whatever.
For me based on my personal experience I have to assume that there were placebos going around. How many I don't know, but the pharmacist himself was questioning why he was the one not having any problems. It made no sense even to him.
Although the 3rd shot gave him problems, but I guess it's a game of roulette. The more you take, the higher the chance of major problems.