Q (and/or) Anons, please respond. If no mention of specific intel/data in posts, is specific/direct mention of assets (friend, foe, or otherwise), compromising?
I do not want to be responsible for operations going wrong due to premature exposure/mentions.
Again, please respond. Relevant Data/Intel is not being mentioned anywhere. Not even in Q's posts.
Confident that the team is aware of the issue I have presented but I want to verify, yet at the same time I am hesitant due to concern about premature exposure; Timing is everything.
Training facilities disguised as Mosques?
Airport security and "in charges" linked to [insert terror group name]?
Visas; Central Hub.
Gets a new Visa to [Western Nation named],
Goes to [Western Nation named],
Terrorist Acts in [Western Nation named], Retreats back to ( $4 illion (+2 East )),
Repeat.
Those who know tried to warn. Improper channels (bad actors got intel first). Don't want to list names or specific places. Lives potentially at risk.
Hear say source, may be nothing, but source was EXTREMELY specific. Refusing to elaborate further. Loose lips sink ships.
Los Angeles whores…
If the teams know, then my concerns and that of others are already put to rest. If not, then I'm certain they will be easily able to figure out what I'm worried about.
That mother fucker Sam Hyde at it again.