>>1912000

Sorry that I neglected my post on previous board.

To clarify:

We should be looking at all the twitters

of all the administration

where clues are left for us to follow

DOD, and all the others

cabinet members twitters

family members twitters

speeches made by POTUS

speeches made by cabinet members

if we paid close attention

we could actually name who is Q

got it??

>>1913227

They are outing themselves when they post clues.

There is still mystery involved, because you have to know VALID Q clues

and there will always be the wonder

"is this meant as a clue to follow"

and maybe it's not really "who is Q"

but a clue is a clue is a clue

and worth considering as something to note

If "Q" does not appear

we should look in another place

because hey – we're working here –

and we need guidance of where to go

or if we've gotten something wrong

or if there is a detail of something we're researching that is important

the point is our research needs to stay on point

facts need to be confirmed etc

all those times we didn't know what "P" meant

maybe we just missed it

and when Q doesn't clarify

it COULD mean we missed it

and it's not a future reference point

just saying

we need to listen to all of the players in this

because there is a lot of research to do