Anonymous ID: ee07ea July 6, 2023, 7:57 a.m. No.19132804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2842 >>2883

>>19132774

I guess Q is trying to protect us from ourselves.

Maybe they have set fail safe traps for us if we were to find out the truth.

We don't want to fall into their traps.

We want them to fall into the Q traps.

Anonymous ID: ee07ea July 6, 2023, 8:13 a.m. No.19132870   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2879

>>19132574

The Jewish "coincidence"

But don't mention it, or you will be labeled as "antisemitic" which is as bad as being "a racist"

 

Soros manages the Soros Family Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, which distributes around US$1.5 billion a year to advance human rights and democratic governments, as well as some charities considered causes aligned with more liberal American politics.[5] Soros established himself as a philanthropist with his first major contribution to theJewishFunds for Justice.[6]

 

According to a 2011 profile in The Wall Street Journal, Soros' focus is on "progressive causes."[6] Since then, he has joined the board of directors of organizations including Global Witness (as an advisory board member), which campaigns against environmental and human rights abuses associated with the exploitation of natural resources; the Open Society Foundations, which works to establish government accountability and democratic processes internationally; and Bend the Arc (which was formed by the merger of the ProgressiveJewishAlliance andJewishFunds for Justice in 2012).[7]

 

Soros continues to donate to political causes as well. In March 2012 he donated $200,000 to theJewishCouncil for Education and Research, the organization behind 2008's "Great Schlep" in support of then-candidate Barack Obama.[8]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Soros

Anonymous ID: ee07ea July 6, 2023, 8:23 a.m. No.19132917   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2920 >>2931 >>2942 >>2948

>>19132842

There would be no point in Q telling us about the problem if there wasn't already a solution in place.

Why tell someone about a problem, just to watch them go off half-cocked and flying off the handle?

Better to lay things out in such a way that the solution is already in hand before the problem is presented.

 

Husband to wife: The house is flooding, but don't worry because I have a boat outside that we can use to get to safety.

 

Or husband to wife: The house is flooding, hope you can swim.

 

Which one would be a better scenario?