dChan
Anonymous ID: 6b44aa July 7, 2023, 9:19 a.m. No.19139158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9165 >>9166 >>9201

Q DROP #4799

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 09/30/2020 23:52:42 ID: 376386

8kun/qresearch: 10864489

Anonymous 09/30/2020 23:43:23 ID:39774c

8kun/qresearch: 10864305

 

Image Name: 09302020nyt1.png

Filename: 08e41859ca2515db376999299074104a284701075e774fa4c4ab36b1ebe9d5d8.png

 

Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns With Pope’s Critics

Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.

By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes

Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET

 

ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China. He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”

An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture.

The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.

“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who, as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.

But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as about China policy.

Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.

Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism.

In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief allies and delighted his chief critics.

Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances.

He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html

 

>>10864305

When does a Church become a playground?

When does a Church become a business?

When does a Church become political?

When does a Church become corrupt?

When does a Church become willfully blind?

When does a Church become controlled?

Q

Anonymous ID: 6b44aa July 7, 2023, 9:33 a.m. No.19139222   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19139210

 

Reichskonkordat

Reichskonkordat Concordat between the Holy See and the German Reich

Signed 20 July 1933

Effective 10 September 1933

Signatories

Eugenio Pacelli

Franz von Papen

 

Parties

Holy See Holy See

Nazi Germany Germany

 

The Reichskonkordat ("Concordat between the Holy See and the German Reich"[1]) is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli, who later became Pope Pius XII, on behalf of Pope Pius XI and Vice Chancellor Franz von Papen on behalf of President Paul von Hindenburg and the German government. It was ratified 10 September 1933 and it has been in force from that date onward. The treaty guarantees the rights of the Catholic Church in Germany. When bishops take office Article 16 states they are required to take an oath of loyalty to the Governor or President of the German Reich established according to the constitution.

 

The Reichskonkordat is the most controversial of several concordats that the Vatican negotiated during the pontificate of Pius XI. It is frequently discussed in works that deal with the rise of Hitler in the early 1930s and the Holocaust.

The concordat has been described by some as giving moral legitimacy to the Nazi regime soon after Hitler had acquired quasi-dictatorial powers through the Enabling Act of 1933, an Act itself facilitated through the support of the Catholic Centre Party.

 

The treaty places constraints on the political activity of German clergy of the Catholic Church. Following the passage of the 1935 Nuremberg Laws for example, a policy of nonintervention was followed. The majority of the German church hierarchy regarded the treaty as a symbol of peace between church and state.[3] From a Catholic church perspective it has been argued that the Concordat prevented even greater evils being unleashed against the Church.[4]

Though some German bishops were unenthusiastic, and the Allies at the end of World War II felt it inappropriate, Pope Pius XII successfully argued to keep the concordat in force. It is still in force today.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichskonkordat

Anonymous ID: 6b44aa July 7, 2023, 9:34 a.m. No.19139228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9229

>>19139223

The New Deal turns 90: So does the Reichskonkordat

It was the Catholic Centre Party that in March 1933 provided the biggest chunk of non-Nazi votes when the Reichstag passed the Enabling Act that gave Hitler unrestrained power.

June 30, 2023

 

Our year 2023 is full of big anniversaries on both sides of the Atlantic – some get toasted, some get skipped. There are centennials like Henry Kissinger’s birthday, which gets toasted, at least by Henry Kissinger and fans of Realpolitik. Adolf Hitler’s botched beer hall putsch in Munich turns 100, which would get celebrated had it made toast of Hitler. The putsch happened towards the end of 1923 when young Kissinger, growing up not far from Munich, was just learning how to speak with a German accent.

 

And then there are this year’s 90th anniversaries. Among them is the New Deal and FDR’s whirlwind of progressive legislation in 1933. You’d think that earlier this year, at least a few clients of Silicon Valley Bank had reasons to uncork a bottle of California chardonnay and toast the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s 90th birthday.

 

It’s safe to assume that no Rieslings will be uncorked in Germany, at least not publicly, to toast political deals that turn 90 this year. This has a simple reason. In January 1933 the putschist from 10 years earlier was appointed chancellor and all deals after that bore his signature. In a breathtakingly short period of time, Hitler transformed his Nazi minority government into a full-blown personal dictatorship: not by having his Brownshirts stage another insurrection but by charming organized religion. It was the Catholic Centre Party that in March 1933 provided the biggest chunk of non-Nazi votes when the Reichstag passed the Enabling Act that gave Hitler unrestrained power.

 

That was shocking and unexpected. Protestants – not Catholics – were known to be hyper-patriotic Prussians and obedient subjects to autocrats like the former emperor. The Kaiser was also their head of church until he fled the country and made room for democracy and the Weimar Republic in 1918. Many Protestants were glad to see another strongman back in charge who would renew the alliance between altar and throne, even if the throne had a big swastika on it this time. For German Catholics the go-to strongman and protector was in Rome, not Berlin.

 

Yet, Pope Pius XI was just as much into Realpolitik as Henry Kissinger would be some 40 years later. In his dealings with dictatorial governments, he acted more like a shrewd politician than a good shepherd, true to his own encyclical fittingly issued in 1933:

 

“Universally known is the fact that the Catholic Church is never bound to one form of government more than to another…She does not find any difficulty in adapting herself to various civil institutions, be they monarchic or republican, aristocratic or democratic.”

 

He could have added “fascist” to that list. In 1929, the pope was able to regain territorial sovereignty over Vatican City by signing a concordat with the Italian state, which acknowledged Benito Mussolini’s government and gave the fascist movement a big reputational boost.

 

Unlike Mussolini, Hitler didn’t have real estate to give away, but just like Mussolini he was staunchly anti-communist, a sentiment Pius XI shared with both dictators. Beyond his anti-Marxist and pro-business credentials, Hitler had more things to offer that were of interest to Pius XI. Not surprisingly, money was one of them – German taxpayers’ money. The Catholic Church in Germany was promised generous state funding as long as it would not oppose Nazi politics and have its bishops swear a loyalty oath to the Reich. Even before the Reichskonkordat was signed, the pope let it be known that he had changed his mind about Hitler and thought he’d make a great ally in the fight against the godless Bolsheviks. The shepherd in Rome was willing to throw his German sheep, most of which were not big fans of Hitler, under the bus. That included the parliamentarians of the Catholic Centre Party who were told to vote in favor of the Enabling Act and Hitler’s totalitarian power grab.

 

The Reichskonkordat was the first agreement that gave international recognition to the Nazi regime. That it came from a moral authority like the Holy See changed Hitler’s image in the eyes of many from screaming gang leader to respectable statesman.

Anonymous ID: 6b44aa July 7, 2023, 9:34 a.m. No.19139229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9238 >>9255

>>19139228

If you rummage through the dustbin of history where all the other Nazi legislation has gone, you won’t find the Reichskonkordat. The simple reason: it hasn’t been trashed yet. In fact, it’s still the law of the land. In Germany newly appointed bishops to this day swear loyalty to state and government (no longer to the Third Reich, luckily) and promise that their priests will be loyal too. In return, state governments make sure that every parishioner pays their mandatory dues to the church, which in 2022 added just shy of 7 billion euros to the bishops’ coffers. This cozy fiscal relationship with the state is one of the reasons why Rome has no problem keeping the concordat alive. Known for ruthless efficiency, the Nazis in 1934 streamlined the process, put a “religion” box on Third Reich W2s and had employers directly withhold church tax from every employee. Payroll deduction is still how it’s done today. As the religious landscape has become more diverse, non-Christian faith communities too are happily contracting with Germany’s version of the IRS to have their membership fees collected. That this service is being used by many Jewish congregations in today’s federal republic is a belated and well-deserved slap in the face of its brown-shirted inventors.

 

Instead of leading separate lives as they do in the U.S. or France, church and state in Germany continue to be an odd (and old) couple. This is despite all efforts of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s current coalition of left, liberal and green forces to disentangle that relationship. Chances are that the Reichskonkordat will make it well and alive to its centennial. Next year it will be just 40 years since the U.S. and the Vatican established diplomatic relations. No concordat was needed in 1984, only a common enemy. Guess which evil empire it was that Ronald Reagan and John Paul II joined forces against.

https://www.minnpost.com/community-voices/2023/06/the-new-deal-turns-90-so-does-the-reichskonkordat/

Anonymous ID: 6b44aa July 7, 2023, 9:45 a.m. No.19139293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9326

>>19139273

PLEASE GOD HELP US!!!

 

PATER noster, qui es in cœlis; sanctificetur nomen tuum: Adveniat regnum tuum; fiat voluntas tua, sicut in cœlo, et in terra.

Panem nostrum cotidianum da nobis hodie: Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris: et ne nos inducas in tentationem: sed libera nos a malo.

 

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 11/14/2017 21:25:29 ID: wmN+33xv #154

4chan/pol: 149467690

Who financed 9-11?

Who was Bin Laden’s handler?

Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?

Why not MI?

If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they’ had a plan to conduct ‘another’ mass extinction event.

WWI & II - orchestrated and planned by select families?

Fantasy land.

Remember, the more people there are, the more power the people have.

Why do D’s push for gun control ‘directly’ after every tragic incident?

Why is this so very important to their agenda?

We, the people, are who they are afraid of.

We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

 

Our Father who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done

on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread,

and forgive us ourtrespasses,

as we forgive those whotrespassagainst us,

and lead us not into temptation,

but deliver us from evil.

Q

 

 

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 12/09/2017 13:12:19 ID: 571cae#306

8chan/cbts: 60141

News unlocks map.

Future proves past.

Why was the Lord's prayer posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

What just came out re: the Lord's prayer?

What can be connected?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Re-review the map post relevant news drops.

Godfather III.

Q

 

>>17904786

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 12/09/2017 13:16:56 ID: 571cae#307

8chan/cbts: 60172

Q DROP #154

Anonymous 12/09/2017 13:13:29 ID:e60938

8chan/cbts: 60150

>>60141

Tues Nov 4th,

 

Who financed9-11?

Who was Bin Laden's handler?

Why was theClowns In Americatasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?

Why not MI?

If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

Why wouldn't we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they' had a plan to conduct ‘another' mass extinction event.

WWI & II - orchestrated and planned by select families?

Fantasy land.

Remember, the more people there are, the more power the people have.

Why do D's push for gun control ‘directly' after every tragic incident?

Why is this so very important to their agenda?

We, the people, are who they are afraid of.

We, the people, are who they fear will one day awake.

 

Our Father who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done

on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread,

and forgive us our trespasses,

as we forgive those who trespass against us,

and lead us not into temptation,

but deliver us from evil.

Q

>>60150

The "marker."

Learn to read the map.

News unlocks the map.

Q

 

 

''' 'member that time Q prayed the Catholic version of the OUR FATHER or LORDS PRAYER with Anons in that drop about the CIA SAUDI ARABIA > UBL > SEAL TEAM 6 > who financed 9-11?'''