Just want to add the following:
WikiLeaks is either comp'd or probably act like they are against Q, so Q followers will react more aggressively on it and push Q further and prove the sceptics wrong. A risky strategy, but it could work.
Just want to add the following:
WikiLeaks is either comp'd or probably act like they are against Q, so Q followers will react more aggressively on it and push Q further and prove the sceptics wrong. A risky strategy, but it could work.
I get it. Indeed. The very right post is (imho) one of the best intuitive and direct proofs to WL and Q connection.
You are a funny anon. Go and shill somewhere else.
Wait, that missing "o" on that Julian Assange twitter post might also explain that. Maybe a hint? Look out for "o" being replaced with "q"?
This is the original?