Limiting the definition of what constitutes something being notable. It's not like they're official endorsements or something. Anyway, it's not the first time a baker tried to power trip over how they want "their" bread to look in an attempt to control Anons' behavior, and it won't be the last either.
>Participate in the MuhJoo hate narrative or we'll call you a Joo. A JOO!
Their labels are no different than calling a black man a white supremacist. Just loud, repetitive, low IQ literary tripe.
If the baker wants to run a single bread like it's the whole damn ship, that's their prerogative. Must be around that time that baker drama is created, huh? That's always been an exploitable point.
>Says the faggot whose every other damned word is muhjoo, followed by shill and filtered.
I have 1000s of posts attached to my IP hash that say otherwise, so… you're wrong. As always. Not enough meat on your bones to satisfy my filter. Maybe if I tenderize you a bit it'll be moar inclined.
But… I don't ever say, "Another day at the office?" You shitheads say that to me and post AI generated poetry about me, although I have seen you do one specifically for Swordy in the mornings. "Hurr durr, persona." I've been nothing but myself, so if you address me I will respond. How bah dah?
Now they have to choose, continue down the easy path of ethnic accusation ammunition for division purposes, or to focus on a single Anon that shines a spotlight on their bullshit and ruthlessly criticizes them for it, to the point they've labeled their target a "board critic." Choose wisely, fucktarded shills.
They're BVs here. At least learn the goddamn comms, for fuck's sake.
Do you really want to revel in the satisfaction of them feeling ashamed of themselves for realizing they were wrong? I don't. Why make them feel any moar pain?
>Anything Jew-related is considered 'muh joo' or anti-Semitic.
That's not true. But when it's nothing but stereotypical accusations and propaganda, or the crime is implied to be their ethnicity, it gets pushed back on.
>But I'm going deathcon 3 against jannies
They're BVs here. "Jannies" is a halfchan term. Mind your surroundings, newfag. Here, maybe this will help you understand:
Attack Jim W if and when possible, when that fails
Attack BO, when that fails
Attack BVs, when that fails
Attack Bakers, when that fails
Attack anons, when that fails
Return to top of list and repeat
Yeah, but saying it is doesn't mean it is. If it was true it wouldn't have to be spammed 24/7 all over the internet that is not under your control, now would it? Your constant bombardment/obsession with a single ethnicity wouldn't be necessary, nor would people have to be paid to post your intellectual garbage.
So refute the message and not the messenger then, you fucking imbecile. But wait, you won't and you can't. You only have a narrow selection of responses to reply to me with, don't you little NPC?
>it violates the concept of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.
Logical fallacy. Freedom of speech and freedom from consequences of said free speech are not mutually exclusive.
Your brian, have you tried turning it off and on again? It could help your comprehension issues.
Ready
Bookending mirrors.