Anonymous ID: 245c13 July 10, 2023, 4:34 p.m. No.19158066   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19158004

>>19158032

>I see no evidence

>None

Just because you're ignorant of the truth, it doesn't mean the truth does not exist.

 

"I see no evidence"

Who cares, you're just talking about your own flaws, not reality.

Anonymous ID: 245c13 July 10, 2023, 5:06 p.m. No.19158248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8262

>>19158178

>When asked specifically if she would support a transgender woman in the U.S. women's soccer team even if it displaced a biological woman, Rapinoe went so far as to deny the distinction even existed.

>"Absolutely," she said. "‘You’re taking a ‘real’ woman’s place,’ that’s the part of the argument that’s still extremely transphobic. I see trans women as real women. What you’re saying automatically in the argument—you’re sort of telling on yourself already—is you don’t believe these people are women. Therefore, they’re taking the other spot. I don’t feel that way."

 

By her own logic, even saying 'trans-woman' must thereby be 'transphobic', because by saying that, there is a male predicate attributed to the person.

 

The only way to be consistent would to no longer say 'trans-women' at all, but just 'women'.

Anonymous ID: 245c13 July 10, 2023, 5:11 p.m. No.19158269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8280

>>19158262

They're all 'transphobic' by their own logic.

Isn't it fun and interesting?

The loudest accusers of "YOU'RE A TRANSPHOBE FOR DENYING TRANS-WOMEN ARE WOMEN", are the loudest transphobes.