>>19159411

>What does that have to do with anything being discussed

Jewish influence in organized crime families, the DOJ, and the American government looks pretty relevant. Unfortunately, the historical peculiarities and design of 8kun suggest that it will be difficult to get a meaningful discussion of Judaism and its discontents on this forum. Imageboards are optimal for posting images and sarcastic snippets of text. Imageboards are not designed for detailed arguments about criminology, history, or espionage. We can realistically hope Watkins knows what he is doing. We can realistically hope Q comes back and drops some DECLAS on us. We can't realistically hope for a sober or scholarly discussion of Jewish influence here.

>>19159565

>you're not an anon, you're here to help your tribe

Being Jewish does not disqualify a person from being anon. Jews are not monolithic. There are Jews who oppose Israel. There are Jews who oppose unethical Jewish business leaders. There are anons who happen to be Jewish – whether by birth, religion, or whatever other criterion. There were even a few Jewish-American war heroes in World War 2 who gave their lives to save non-Jewish Americans. However, due to the peculiarities of the imageboard format, sober and nuanced details of sociology and history get drowned out by exaggerated bloviations. The Board Owner has said that if bakers don't like his policies, they are free to start their own forums. I sincerely hope that they start forums that manage to host high-quality debates. 8kun will always have a special place in my heart, but it is not a place for productive debates on Jewish influence.

The ideal of civilized debate crystallized in a more civilized time. My own standards of debate were set long before I was born, by the Founding Fathers of the USA. 8kun may be a very American place, and a very good place for American patriots, but it is not a place that can deliver the sort of debates that the Founding Fathers had. I hope the anons who are not satisfied here can build better debate communities. I am not holding my breath.

>>19159573

NOTABLE

>>19159594

>You're not being informative, you're being malicious and it's obvious you're just posting your propaganda

He's being slightly informative, but it's not a productive use of information. He's not malicious; he's just bloviating loudly. He's not more propagandistic than usual. The problem is that the board format is optimal for posting pictures and shocking snippets of text. Imageboards are ideal for shocking sound bytes. Of course every post looks like "propaganda" if you don't like it. It's not propaganda, it's shitposting. And shitposting is the teleological purpose of imageboards in general. Can /qresearch be a forum for something more productive than shitposting? Maybe if Q comes back and drops the DECLAS, /qresearch will serve a purpose higher than shitposting. Until that time … it's all shitposts, all the time.